item_archive

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the item is 'moved to the archive and hidden from regular views,' and clarifies the non-destructive nature by contrasting with permanent deletion. This is meaningful behavioral context beyond a simple verb, though it could mention reversibility or permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the primary action, and every word earns its place. The distinction from deletion is packed efficiently into the second sentence without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with two well-documented required parameters and no output schema. The description covers the core behavior and its non-destructive nature, making it contextually complete for typical use. A minor gap is lack of mention of how archived items are accessed or restored, but that is not essential.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with both 'vaultId' and 'itemId' already documented. The description adds no additional parameter context, so it does not exceed the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Archive') and the resource ('an item in a 1Password vault'), and distinguishes the tool from sibling item_delete by explicitly noting it is 'rather than being permanently deleted.' This is a specific, differentiating purpose statement.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context by contrasting archiving with permanent deletion, helping the agent choose between item_archive and item_delete. It does not explicitly name sibling tools or provide when-not-to-use guidance, but the 'rather than being permanently deleted' phrase gives clear contextual direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.