Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MITRE ATT&CK Mapper MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Comprehensive MITRE ATT\&CK MCP server with SOC integration for technique lookup, alert mapping, and coverage analysis.
      26
      8 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying MITRE ATT&CK STIX data, including adversary tactics, techniques, and procedures, via an MCP server connected to the Pipeworx gateway.
      1 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes the MITRE ATT\&CK framework to LLMs and AI assistants via the Model Context Protocol, enabling querying of techniques, tactics, groups, software, and mitigations.
      9
      82 PyPI
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      This MCP server wraps the SOLVE-IT digital forensics knowledge base, enabling LLMs to query techniques, weaknesses, mitigations, and their relationships through a set of MCP tools.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct ATT&CK resource (tactics, techniques, groups, mitigations, incident mapping), but the generic return descriptions could cause an agent to misselect if relying solely on descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a verb_noun pattern in snake_case, but 'group_threat_actor' uses 'group' as an atypical verb, slightly deviating from the clearer verbs like list, map, lookup, query.

    Tool Count4/5

    5 tools is a reasonable count for a focused ATT&CK mapper, covering key operations, though there is room for a few more (e.g., listing techniques, sub-techniques) without being overbearing.

    Completeness3/5

    Core workflows like technique lookup, tactic listing, and incident mapping are covered, but missing obvious operations like listing all techniques, threat groups independently, or software, leaving notable gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues