Skip to main content
Glama
CSOAI-ORG

MEOK MCP Hardening MCP

by CSOAI-ORG
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to MEOK MCP Hardening MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • meok-mcp-injection-scan-mcp

      CSOAI-ORG
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Scans MCP servers for prompt-injection, tool-poisoning, and SSRF vulnerabilities using 30+ canonical rules across 5 severity tiers, with optional signed safety reports for procurement.
      5
      MIT

    • AIShield

      lm203688
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Scans MCP servers and AI tools for security risks, providing 4-dimensional scoring and badges, with optional guardrail MCP for auto-protection.
      2
      MIT

    • mcp-fortress

      mcp-fortress
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Scans MCP servers for security vulnerabilities, prompt injection, and tool poisoning, providing risk scores and protection.
      4
      MIT

    • MCP Shield

      rob925
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Security scanner and MCP server that catches dangerous patterns in MCP servers and AI agent projects, such as leaked secrets, shell execution, and prompt-injection text. Runs as both a CLI and MCP server with CI-friendly severity gates.
      2
      1
      MIT

    • tooltrust-mcp

      AgentSafe-AI
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Scans MCP servers for prompt injection, supply chain attacks, excessive permissions, and code execution risks. Includes an offline blacklist that catches known-compromised packages like LiteLLM 1.82.7/1.82.8 and Trivy with zero latency.
      19
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct security audit task: full server audit, per-description scan, specific vulnerability checks, template generation, listing rules, and signing reports. No overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names use underscore and follow verb_noun pattern, but verbs vary: 'audit', 'check', 'generate', 'list', 'sign'. While readable, the mix of verbs reduces consistency compared to a uniform pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    7 tools is well-scoped for a security hardening server. Each tool addresses a distinct need without being too few or excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers core audit workflows: full server audit, per-tool scan, specific checks (destructive, supply chain), template generation, reference map, and report signing. Minor gap: no direct apply/patch tool, but overall comprehensive.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources