Set system settings values in Creatio

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description bears full responsibility. It states that the tool returns a result but does not disclose whether the operation is destructive, what authentication is needed, or any side effects. The description is too vague for an update operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is reasonably short but includes redundant repetition of schema examples under 'USAGE'. The front-loading is acceptable (clear verb first), but some sentences could be combined or removed to be more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the single nested parameter and no output schema, the description adequately explains the parameter structure with examples. However, it lacks details on return values, error handling, and behavioral aspects (e.g., idempotency), leaving gaps for a complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%; the input schema already includes a detailed description and examples. The description adds the same usage examples, providing minimal additional meaning. It reinforces the structure but does not significantly enhance understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (update), resource (system settings), and scope (one or more in a single request). The verb 'update' and mention of 'system settings values' distinguish it from sibling tools like 'update-sys-setting-definition' and 'create-sys-setting', though explicit differentiation is absent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage examples are provided for single, multiple, and mixed types, giving clear context. However, there is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., 'create-sys-setting' for new settings) or when not to use it. No exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.