Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to lsd-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to build, validate, calibrate, and export versioned scientific models with mandatory units, dimensional and numerical checks, and uncertainty analysis over stdio. Models can be simulated and exported to portable formats such as SBML, CellML, and Modelica.
      158 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI hosts to design and simulate complex adaptive systems, including managing agent types, running simulations, and analyzing emergent behavior, feedback loops, and sensitivities.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read and write .mph model files, control the COMSOL desktop GUI in real time, and run complete modeling, meshing, solving, and post-processing workflows.
      23
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible agents to generate Qucs circuit schematics, run simulations, and parse results programmatically.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct scopes (model management, configuration editing, execution, and sensitivity analysis). Slight overlap exists between set_values and edit_structure's set_instance_values operation, and between set_run_settings and run_configuration's seed/runs overrides, but descriptions distinguish them well.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Predominantly snake_case verb_noun names such as list_models, read_equations, and create_model. Deviations are the sa_ prefix for sensitivity-analysis tools and lsd_status, but these are readable and consistent within their subgroups.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 17 tools, the set is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range but the domain is broad and each tool covers a distinct workflow step. The count is reasonable, though a couple of configuration-editing tools could potentially be merged.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong across the model lifecycle (create, copy, read/write equations, edit structure, compile, run) and sensitivity analysis (design, run, analyze). Minor gaps include no delete_model/delete_configuration and no explicit list_results, which agents can partially work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues