Skip to main content
Glama
CLawrence124

ot-dossier-mcp

by CLawrence124
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to ot-dossier-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • RefSentry

      LloydPhuc
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to verify citations and bibliographies and to check whether source documents support factual claims, using local inference, exact evidence provenance, and deterministic verdicts.
      MIT

    • proofspec

      christian140903-sudo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables defining and verifying evidence contracts for claims in READMEs, releases, or product pages using constrained verifiers and generating hash-chained receipts and reports.
      5 npm
      MIT

    • opentargets-mcp

      nickzren
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes the Open Targets Platform GraphQL API as a set of tools for querying biomedical data such as targets, diseases, drugs, and genetic evidence.
      68
      266 PyPI
      19
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools have distinct verbs and roles: one assembles/replays evidence, the other validates references against an assembled packet. They are part of the same pipeline, which introduces mild sequencing ambiguity, but a careful reading of the descriptions clearly separates their purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools use snake_case with a leading verb (assemble_..., validate_...) and noun-phrase tails. The verb_noun pattern is consistent throughout, with no style mixing.

    Tool Count3/5

    Only 2 tools is on the thin side, though the server's scope (a single frozen evidence dossier workflow) is narrow enough that this is borderline rather than clearly wrong. A few more operations would make it feel better scoped.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers an assemble-and-validate loop but appears locked to one hardcoded disease pair (NOD2/TNF and IBD) with no discovery, listing, or update operations, and no way to build or modify the underlying packet. Notable gaps remain for a general dossier workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources