The Intelligence Radar MCP server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to The Intelligence Radar MCP server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search, filter, and explore a local offline catalog of tools from awesome lists, including finding underrated tools, explaining ranking provenance, listing curator lists, and inspecting catalog facets. All access is read-only over local SQLite with no network calls or API keys.43 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to generate Mermaid architecture diagrams, inspect repository structure and module details, and assess changed-module blast radius versus a git ref for local codebases.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to explore, search, and read codebase repositories and API specifications efficiently, with support for file searching, content search via ripgrep, and reading API specs.19 npmISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to search locally indexed code and research notes, returning file, line, and source-link references without external accounts or API keys.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search a codebase by meaning using local AI embeddings, finding relevant code even when terminology differs from the query. Also provides package version lookup across 20+ registries, workspace switching, reindexing, cache clearing, and status checks.26 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables local-first hybrid knowledge retrieval from authorized Markdown and plain-text files, combining full-text and vector search with reranking and traceable source references via a single search tool.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Most tools target a clearly distinct resource plus action: read-side (search_radar, get_entry, get_dimension, list_dimensions, list_judgements, get_sources, get_sector, check_plan) and contribution-side (prepare/submit/revise/withdraw/my_contributions) are cleanly separated, and prepare vs submit is explicitly spelled out. The main soft spots are search_radar vs show_radar (both can surface a filtered set of entries) and about_radar vs how_to_contribute, which an agent could plausibly mix up on a first call.
Names are uniformly snake_case and overwhelmingly follow verb_noun (submit_contribution, get_entry, list_dimensions, check_plan, sign_in_with_github). A few break the verb pattern (my_contributions, about_radar, how_to_contribute), but they are readable and internally sensible rather than chaotic.
18 tools is on the heavy side, but the server genuinely spans three surfaces: content discovery/reading, plan and radar analysis, and a full contribution lifecycle plus GitHub auth. Nearly every tool earns its place, though the read side (search/get/list/show/dimension/sector/sources) is dense enough that some consolidation could be considered.
The read surface is thorough (search, entry, dimension, judgements, sources, sector, plan check, interactive view) and the contribution lifecycle covers prepare, submit, revise, withdraw, status, sign-in/out and applying as a contributor. Minor gaps: how_to_contribute references reviewing contributions, yet no reviewer-facing tool exists in the set, and there is no direct 'browse by label' entry point beyond search filters.