Skip to main content
Glama
The Intelligence Radar MCP server

The Intelligence Radar MCP server

Official
by BrightbeamAI

Related Servers

Alternatives to The Intelligence Radar MCP server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search, filter, and explore a local offline catalog of tools from awesome lists, including finding underrated tools, explaining ranking provenance, listing curator lists, and inspecting catalog facets. All access is read-only over local SQLite with no network calls or API keys.
      43 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to search locally indexed code and research notes, returning file, line, and source-link references without external accounts or API keys.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search a codebase by meaning using local AI embeddings, finding relevant code even when terminology differs from the query. Also provides package version lookup across 20+ registries, workspace switching, reindexing, cache clearing, and status checks.
      26 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local-first hybrid knowledge retrieval from authorized Markdown and plain-text files, combining full-text and vector search with reranking and traceable source references via a single search tool.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a clearly distinct resource plus action: read-side (search_radar, get_entry, get_dimension, list_dimensions, list_judgements, get_sources, get_sector, check_plan) and contribution-side (prepare/submit/revise/withdraw/my_contributions) are cleanly separated, and prepare vs submit is explicitly spelled out. The main soft spots are search_radar vs show_radar (both can surface a filtered set of entries) and about_radar vs how_to_contribute, which an agent could plausibly mix up on a first call.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names are uniformly snake_case and overwhelmingly follow verb_noun (submit_contribution, get_entry, list_dimensions, check_plan, sign_in_with_github). A few break the verb pattern (my_contributions, about_radar, how_to_contribute), but they are readable and internally sensible rather than chaotic.

    Tool Count4/5

    18 tools is on the heavy side, but the server genuinely spans three surfaces: content discovery/reading, plan and radar analysis, and a full contribution lifecycle plus GitHub auth. Nearly every tool earns its place, though the read side (search/get/list/show/dimension/sector/sources) is dense enough that some consolidation could be considered.

    Completeness4/5

    The read surface is thorough (search, entry, dimension, judgements, sources, sector, plan check, interactive view) and the contribution lifecycle covers prepare, submit, revise, withdraw, status, sign-in/out and applying as a contributor. Minor gaps: how_to_contribute references reviewing contributions, yet no reviewer-facing tool exists in the set, and there is no direct 'browse by label' entry point beyond search filters.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues