get_host

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full behavioral burden. It says nothing about whether this is a read-only operation, what authentication is needed, or what kind of details are returned. The presence of an output schema reduces the need to describe return values, but safety and permissions context is absent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no wasted words. It is appropriately sized for a simple tool, though it could be slightly more informative without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has one required parameter, no annotations, and an output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the parameter, behavior, or how it relates to sibling tools. The output schema helps with return values, but the description leaves significant gaps in understanding the tool's operation and context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With schema description coverage at 0%, the description does not compensate by explaining the 'alias' parameter's meaning or format. However, with only 1 parameter and an output schema present, the schema provides the structure, though the description adds no semantic value about what an alias represents.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Dettagli di un host' (Details of a host) states the resource (host) and that it returns details, but it's vague about what 'details' means and does not distinguish itself from sibling tools like list_hosts or hosts_summary. It conveys the general purpose but lacks the specificity needed for confident sibling differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use get_host versus list_hosts, hosts_summary, or ping. The description offers no context about usage conditions or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.