detach_clients

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are supplied, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. The qualifier 'gli altri' (the other clients) hints that the current client stays attached, which is the only behavioral detail. It discloses nothing about permissions, whether the session must exist, reversibility, or effect on the acting client.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short, front-loaded sentence with no filler, so nothing is wasted. But its brevity is under-specification rather than efficiency for a tool with two undocumented required parameters and no annotations.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a session-mutating tool with no annotations and 0% schema coverage, the description is too thin. The presence of an output schema covers return values, but the missing parameter meaning, usage context, and behavioral effects leave the definition incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for both required parameters. The description mentions 'sessione', loosely implying the 'name' parameter, but gives no meaning for 'alias' (the host/server) and no format or constraint guidance. It fails to compensate for the documentation gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb ('Stacca'/detach) and resource ('client dalla sessione'), so the action is inferable. However it is written in Italian while the tool name and all siblings are English, creating friction, and it never clarifies what a 'client' is or which session/host it targets. Adequate but vague on scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no statement of when to use this tool, no prerequisites, and no alternatives among the many session-management siblings (kill_session, session_details, etc.). The agent must infer usage entirely; no exclusions or context are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.