Skip to main content
Glama
BounceProtect

@bounceprotect/mcp

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to @bounceprotect/mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Email Verification MCP: Verify email addresses, clean lists up to 100,000 addresses and check spamtrap, disposable, spambot and complainer lists from Claude, Cursor or VS Code.
      26 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Lets Claude Desktop read any IMAP mailbox and send emails via SMTP, with support for multiple mailboxes and locally stored credentials.
      13
      24 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables your LLM to validate email addresses. This tool checks email format, domain validity, and deliverability using the AbstractAPI Email Validation API. Perfect for integrating email validation into AI applications like Claude Desktop.
      1
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Sub-15ms edge intelligence tools for Claude Desktop, Cursor, and LLM agent loops. Provides sub-millisecond LLM JSON repair, web-to-markdown token compression (cuts context tokens up to 90%), PII redaction, and RFC 5322 B2B email deliverability verification at zero marginal token cost.
      6
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to verify email addresses in real-time, checking syntax, DNS, MX records, and SMTP handshake, returning verdicts and deliverability scores without sending actual emails.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides email validation and domain configuration auditing tools for AI assistants, enabling single address checks, bulk list cleaning, SPF verification, and full mail setup grading (A-F) with actionable fixes.
      4
      41 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: single validation, bulk validation, credit check, SMTP status, deep analysis trigger, and deep analysis status. The two status tools could be confused at a glance, but their names reference different processes clearly.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_first snake_case pattern (validate, check, get, trigger). The conventions are uniform and easy to predict, with no mixed styles.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is an ideal size for an email validation service, covering the essential operations without unnecessary overlap or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the full validation workflow: single and bulk validation, credit monitoring, asynchronous SMTP status, and deep analysis with its own status check. A minor gap is the lack of explicit upload management or historical view, but the core lifecycle is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues