Skip to main content
Glama
BounceProtect

@bounceprotect/mcp

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to @bounceprotect/mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A lightweight Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables your LLM to validate email addresses. This tool checks email format, domain validity, and deliverability using the AbstractAPI Email Validation API. Perfect for integrating email validation into AI applications like Claude Desktop.
      1
      4
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to verify email addresses in real-time, checking syntax, DNS, MX records, and SMTP handshake, returning verdicts and deliverability scores without sending actual emails.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides email validation and domain configuration auditing tools for AI assistants, enabling single address checks, bulk list cleaning, SPF verification, and full mail setup grading (A-F) with actionable fixes.
      4
      33 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Code or Claude Desktop to verify whether email addresses are deliverable, returning status, sub-status, reason, confidence, and metadata.
      1
      149 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables Claude Desktop to manage emails via SMTP and IMAP. Send emails, fetch unread messages, and create draft replies directly from conversations.
      3
      13 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Desktop to send emails through Mailjet's API using the Model Context Protocol over Server-Sent Events. Provides secure email sending capabilities with API token authentication and user-provided credentials.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: single validation, bulk validation, credit check, SMTP status, deep analysis trigger, and deep analysis status. The two status tools could be confused at a glance, but their names reference different processes clearly.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_first snake_case pattern (validate, check, get, trigger). The conventions are uniform and easy to predict, with no mixed styles.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is an ideal size for an email validation service, covering the essential operations without unnecessary overlap or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the full validation workflow: single and bulk validation, credit monitoring, asynchronous SMTP status, and deep analysis with its own status check. A minor gap is the lack of explicit upload management or historical view, but the core lifecycle is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues