Skip to main content
Glama
BitsBound

BitsBound MCP Server

Official

instant_swarm

Redline entire contracts in parallel by spawning independent AI agents for each section, merging results into a single DOCX with real Track Changes. Requires prior analysis.

Instructions

PARALLEL REDLINING of entire contract. Spawns N independent SAC agents for N sections simultaneously - maximum parallelization with no lock contention. Each agent (IP, Liability, Indemnification, Payment, Term, etc.) independently analyzes and redlines its section, then all branches merge into a single DOCX with real Track Changes. Returns merged document + per-section results. Requires a completed analysis (use process_contract first). This is the flagship feature - full attorney-quality redlines across the entire contract in parallel.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
analysisIdYesThe analysis ID from a completed process_contract call. The analysis provides contract context for each section.
ourPartyNameNoYour company name as it should appear in redlines (e.g., "Acme Corp").
partyPositionYesWhich side are you on? "customer" = you are buying/receiving services. "vendor" = you are selling/providing services.
targetSectionsNoOptional: specific BUBSA sections to analyze. If omitted, analyzes all 17 sections. Valid sections: parties, definitions, ip_license, payment, term_termination, confidentiality, data_privacy, reps_warranties, indemnification, liability, insurance, assignment, force_majeure, dispute_resolution, precedence, miscellaneous, sla
counterpartyNameNoThe other party's name (e.g., "Vendor Inc").
aggressivenessLevelYesHow aggressive the redlines should be (1=conservative, 10=very aggressive). Recommended: 5-7 for balanced approach.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses key behavioral traits: parallel execution with no lock contention, independent agents per section, merging into DOCX with Track Changes, and return of merged document plus per-section results. This adds significant value beyond annotations (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Five sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose. Each sentence adds unique value: parallelization mechanism, prerequisite, behavior, return value, and flagship status. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers purpose, prerequisite, behavior, and return value. However, it lacks details on the format of the returned merged document (e.g., file ID or downloadable link) and does not describe error handling or partial failures. Still, it is fairly complete for a complex tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, so the baseline is 3. The description does not add much detail beyond the schema, but it reinforces the purpose of analysisId (prerequisite) and aggressivenessLevel (recommended range). No additional parameter meaning is provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'PARALLEL REDLINING of entire contract.' It specifies the mechanism (spawns agents for each section, merges into DOCX) and distinguishes it as the 'flagship feature' among siblings. The prerequisite (use process_contract first) is explicitly mentioned.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states the prerequisite: 'Requires a completed analysis (use process_contract first).' It implies when to use this tool (after analysis, for full contract redlining), but does not explicitly contrast with alternatives like generate_redline or ask_clause for single sections.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/BitsBound/bitsbound-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server