Skip to main content
Glama
BitsBound

BitsBound MCP Server

Official
by BitsBound
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to BitsBound MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Claude RAG MCP Pipeline

      kenjisekino
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Desktop to search and query personal document collections (PDF, Word, Markdown, text) using semantic search and conversational AI with full context preservation across exchanges.
      MIT

    • LegalContext

      protomated
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables secure access to legal documents from Clio via Claude Desktop, with local processing and semantic search to ground AI responses in actual documents.
      12 npm
      29
      Mozilla Public 2.0

    • CoreRag

      TJ-Neary
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Desktop to perform local-first semantic search, ingest documents, and manage a private knowledge base with hybrid search, PII redaction, and multi-format support.
      1
      MIT

    • Enterprise Knowledge MCP

      j84077200345-dotcom
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables querying enterprise documents (DOCX, PDF, PPTX) using natural language, with hybrid search and MCP integration for Claude Desktop and other agents.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose with clear boundaries. For example, ask_clause is for instant clause Q&A without prior analysis, extract_clause works on already analyzed contracts, and ask_sac provides contextual advice. Even overlapping areas like check_dealbreakers and compare_playbook serve different functions (quick pass/fail vs. detailed deviation analysis).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., ask_clause, generate_redline, process_contract) using lower_snake_case. The only slight deviation is 'instant_swarm' which is an adjective_noun but still fits the overall style. No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools cover the full contract analysis lifecycle (quick scan, full process, status, clause extraction, redlining, email generation, comparison, etc.) without being excessive. Each tool serves a clear step in the workflow, making the count well-scoped.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core domain thoroughly: triage, full analysis, redlining, negotiation email, and comparison. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to list or manage past analyses, but the essential workflows are complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources