A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceUnlock × capital-flow events as MCP tools (UnlockFlowEvent v1). Illustrative seeds. NFA — not financial advice.
3
MIT
unlockpulse-mcp
by Billibo6
Related Servers
Alternatives to unlockpulse-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseDqualityAmaintenanceDeep Research for crypto - free & fully local 🧠1423 npm169MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceDaily Bitcoin/crypto cycle scoring, on-chain indicators, strategy insights, on-demand backtests. Bearer + x402 pay-per-callMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceOn-chain Solana token safety for trading agents — traces coordinated wallet funding, same-block Jito bundles, serial-rug deployers and live coordinated dumps into one Exit-Liquidity Risk verdict before a swap. Free tier, then $0.02 USDC/query via x402.130 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceRug pull risk scores and on-chain forensics for memecoins on Solana, Ethereum, Base and Robinhood Chain - launch-bundle detection, funding-origin tracing, deployer history, insider networks and whale flow. 15 read-only tools.1532 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMethodology-transparent BTC + ETH whale forensics. 30 tools, anonymous OAuth 2.1 Free tier.MIT
TDQS
A4.4/5.0
Scored across 5 tools
Disambiguation4/5
The calendar tool and the per-token tool clearly differ (many unlocks vs one token, up to 60 days), and their descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other. The only real overlap is between get_method_and_track_record (rating explanation + track record) and get_dataset_info (sources, formula, thresholds, limitations) — both partly explain the rating methodology, so an agent may pause over which to call.
Naming Consistency5/5
All five tools follow a uniform snake_case get_<noun> pattern with descriptive noun phrases. No mixing of conventions, no vague verbs like process or run.
Tool Count5/5
Five tools is well-scoped for a narrow, single-domain data server (unlock calendar, per-token unlocks, on-chain check, methodology, dataset info). Each tool covers a distinct access path and none looks redundant.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers discovery (calendar with filters), drill-down (per token), verification (on-chain), and trust/provenance (method, dataset info) — a coherent lifecycle for this domain. Minor gaps: no tool to enumerate covered tokens/blockchains directly, and past unlocks are only exposed in aggregate via the track record rather than as queryable history for a specific token.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues