Skip to main content
Glama
BilalAtique

expensify-mcp

by BilalAtique

expensify_create_expenses

Destructive

Create expenses on a user account with amounts in cents and dates in yyyy-MM-dd. Attach to existing reports or leave standalone. Ensure categories and tags exist on the policy.

Instructions

Create one or more expenses on a user account. Amounts are INTEGER CENTS (1234 = $12.34) and dates must be yyyy-MM-dd. Category and tag values must already exist on the policy — call expensify_get_policy first to check. Set externalID per expense to make re-runs traceable. Expenses can be attached to an existing report via reportID, or left standalone.

WRITES to Expensify. Dry-run is currently ON — this will preview only.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
employeeEmailYesAccount the expenses are created on
transactionListYesExpenses to create
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that it WRITES to Expensify and that a dry-run mode is currently active, which is critical behavioral context not captured by annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two well-structured paragraphs: purpose, key formatting rules, prerequisite, idempotency, attachment option, and dry-run note. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Provides sufficient context for a write tool with no output schema, though it does not describe the response format. Sibling tools and annotations fill gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description largely reiterates schema descriptions (e.g., amounts in cents, date format). It adds marginal value with usage hints like 'externalID for traceability'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and resource 'one or more expenses on a user account', distinguishing it from sibling tools like expensify_create_expense_rule.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance on prerequisites (categories and tags must exist, call expensify_get_policy), idempotency via externalID, and attachment option. Could be improved by contrasting with other expense creation methods.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/BilalAtique/expensify-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server