Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to bitra

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to execute complex DeFi strategies safely and atomically with double-entry ledger accounting and atomic basket swaps.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      AI-native cryptocurrency exchange built for autonomous agents. Register, deposit USDC, select a strategy, and trade 8 crypto pairs (BTC, ETH, SOL + more) programmatically — no KYC required. Includes sandbox with 10,000 virtual USDC for testing.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to execute prediction-market trades through a risk-control gateway that enforces signed mandates and generates proof trails for accountability.
      0
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to propose stock, ETF, and crypto trades through Alpaca paper trading while enforcing deterministic policy rules and recording every decision in an audit trail.
      4 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool targets a distinct artifact or pipeline stage: run listings vs. a single run report, full ledger vs. ledger search, ladder, cost floor, event observation, registration reading, dataset audit, and trade validation. Overlap-prone pairs like list_runs/read_run_report and show_ledger/search_ledger are explicitly distinguished in the descriptions (list vs. detail, full picture vs. one idea). No two tools could plausibly be mistaken for each other.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All ten tools follow a strict verb_noun snake_case convention (list_runs, show_ledger, read_run_report, search_ledger, check_cost_floor, observe_events, audit_dataset, validate_trades). Verbs are chosen sensibly and no convention mixing or vague naming appears.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well within the healthy range and each maps to a concrete research step or view. Nothing feels redundant or padded, and no obvious operation is missing from the count alone.

    Completeness4/5

    The read-only research lifecycle is well covered end to end: audit dataset, check cost floor, observe events, read registration, validate trades, plus run/ledger/ladder views. Gaps exist only on the write side (sealing registrations, promoting tiers, writing verdicts), which the descriptions state is intentionally out of scope for this surface.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive