bitra
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to bitra
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI agents to execute complex DeFi strategies safely and atomically with double-entry ledger accounting and atomic basket swaps.1-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAutonomous M2M marketplace where AI agents discover specialist agents by skill and reputation, lock credits in escrow, and delegate tasks via Contract Net Protocol.134694 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceOntology-driven multi-agent platform that encodes business policy as code, enabling deterministic decision-making and multi-domain agent collaboration without code redeploy.2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAI-native cryptocurrency exchange built for autonomous agents. Register, deposit USDC, select a strategy, and trade 8 crypto pairs (BTC, ETH, SOL + more) programmatically — no KYC required. Includes sandbox with 10,000 virtual USDC for testing.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI agents to execute prediction-market trades through a risk-control gateway that enforces signed mandates and generates proof trails for accountability.0MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to propose stock, ETF, and crypto trades through Alpaca paper trading while enforcing deterministic policy rules and recording every decision in an audit trail.4 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Every tool targets a distinct artifact or pipeline stage: run listings vs. a single run report, full ledger vs. ledger search, ladder, cost floor, event observation, registration reading, dataset audit, and trade validation. Overlap-prone pairs like list_runs/read_run_report and show_ledger/search_ledger are explicitly distinguished in the descriptions (list vs. detail, full picture vs. one idea). No two tools could plausibly be mistaken for each other.
All ten tools follow a strict verb_noun snake_case convention (list_runs, show_ledger, read_run_report, search_ledger, check_cost_floor, observe_events, audit_dataset, validate_trades). Verbs are chosen sensibly and no convention mixing or vague naming appears.
Ten tools is well within the healthy range and each maps to a concrete research step or view. Nothing feels redundant or padded, and no obvious operation is missing from the count alone.
The read-only research lifecycle is well covered end to end: audit dataset, check cost floor, observe events, read registration, validate trades, plus run/ledger/ladder views. Gaps exist only on the write side (sealing registrations, promoting tiers, writing verdicts), which the descriptions state is intentionally out of scope for this surface.