bitra
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to bitra
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI agents to execute complex DeFi strategies safely and atomically with double-entry ledger accounting and atomic basket swaps.1-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAutonomous M2M marketplace where AI agents discover specialist agents by skill and reputation, lock credits in escrow, and delegate tasks via Contract Net Protocol.13487 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceOntology-driven multi-agent platform that encodes business policy as code, enabling deterministic decision-making and multi-domain agent collaboration without code redeploy.2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAI-native cryptocurrency exchange built for autonomous agents. Register, deposit USDC, select a strategy, and trade 8 crypto pairs (BTC, ETH, SOL + more) programmatically — no KYC required. Includes sandbox with 10,000 virtual USDC for testing.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI agents to execute prediction-market trades through a risk-control gateway that enforces signed mandates and generates proof trails for accountability.0MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to propose stock, ETF, and crypto trades through Alpaca paper trading while enforcing deterministic policy rules and recording every decision in an audit trail.13 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool targets a distinct pipeline stage or artifact (cost floor, dataset audit, event observation, registration, validation, run listing, run report, ladder, ledger), and descriptions explicitly route between near-pairs (list_runs vs read_run_report, show_ledger vs search_ledger). The only real overlap is the ledger pair, which is clearly signposted as whole-picture vs. query-specific, so misselection risk is low but not zero.
Every tool follows a strict snake_case verb_noun pattern: show_ladder, list_runs, read_run_report, audit_dataset, check_cost_floor, check_registration, observe_events, search_ledger, show_ledger, validate_trades. The verb choices (show/list/read/audit/check/observe/search/validate) map predictably to what each tool does, with no casing or style deviations.
Ten tools is well within the ideal band and each maps to a genuine stage of the research lifecycle: cost check, dataset audit, event observation, registration inspection, validation, plus run/ledger/ladder inspection. No tool looks redundant or padded.
The surface is deliberately read-only: there is no way to seal a pre-registration (only check one), write a verdict to the kill ledger, promote/demote a strategy, or launch a backtest/replay, all of which the descriptions reference as existing elsewhere. Core read and validation workflows are covered, but agents hitting the write side of the lifecycle will dead-end and must fall back to other surfaces.