Skip to main content
Glama

Get Process Status by Entity

get_process_status_by_entity
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve the status of an asynchronous process for a specific entity (order item, transport, return) and event type. Returns results in descending order to show the most recent status first.

Instructions

Get the status of asynchronous processes by entity ID and event type. The entity ID can be an order item ID, transport ID, return number, replenishment ID, etc. Results are returned in descending order.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
entityIdYesThe entity ID (e.g. order item ID, transport ID, return number).
eventTypeYesThe event type associated with the entity.
pageNoPage number (50 items per page). Defaults to 1.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read-only and idempotent behavior. Description adds that results are in descending order, but no additional context on side effects or other behaviors beyond what annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with main purpose. No redundant information; each word adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a three-parameter read tool with no output schema, the description adequately covers purpose, parameters, and ordering. Lacks pagination details but they are in schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all parameters. Description adds example entity IDs and implies event type enum, but does not significantly extend beyond schema details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool retrieves process status by entity ID and event type, with examples of valid entity IDs, distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_process_status and get_process_status_bulk.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool over siblings (e.g., get_process_status, get_process_status_bulk). Does not mention when not to use or context for choosing this specific endpoint.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/BartWaardenburg/bol-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server