Obenan MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Obenan MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceThis server provides a note storage system with a custom URI scheme, allowing users to add and summarize notes, with adjustable summary detail levels.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceFacilitates note storage and summarization through custom URIs, allowing users to manage, summarize, and update notes with varying detail levels in a collaborative environment.-
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceThis server enables users to store, manage, and summarize notes using a custom URI scheme, with functionality to add new notes and generate summaries with varying levels of detail.3-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables creating, accessing, and summarizing text notes via URI resources and tools.14 npm-
- FlicenseCqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables creating and managing text notes with a simple note-taking system. Provides tools to create notes, access them via URIs, and generate summaries of all stored notes.41 npm-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA note management MCP server that enables users to store, retrieve, and summarize personal notes via a custom URI scheme. It provides tools for adding content and prompts for generating brief or detailed summaries of stored information.-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: fetch_my_locations retrieves all locations, get_location_details provides details for a specific location, review_analyzer analyzes reviews, and search_locations_by_name searches by name. The descriptions clearly differentiate these functions, making tool selection unambiguous.
The naming is mostly consistent with a verb_noun pattern (fetch_my_locations, get_location_details, search_locations_by_name), but review_analyzer deviates slightly by using a noun_verb structure. This minor inconsistency does not significantly impact readability or predictability.
With 4 tools, this server is well-scoped for managing locations and reviews. Each tool serves a distinct and necessary function, and the count is appropriate for the domain without being too sparse or bloated.
The toolset covers core operations for location management (fetch, get details, search) and review analysis, but there are minor gaps such as missing CRUD operations for locations (e.g., create, update, delete) and reviews. However, agents can work effectively with the provided tools for basic workflows.