AxPlotToData_report_feedback

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It transparently describes that this tool summarizes a previous tool call, with no destructive or hidden side effects. The behavior is fully disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with the main purpose in the first sentence and a clear list of parameters. It is concise at about 5 sentences, but could be slightly tighter by removing redundant parameter descriptions already in schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple feedback tool with no output schema and full parameter coverage, the description completely explains its role, usage, and required inputs. No gaps remain for effective invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters. The description adds context by explaining the purpose and example values (e.g., feedback_value enum), but does not add significant meaning beyond what the schema provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Summarize the tool call you just executed' with a specific verb and resource, clearly indicating its purpose as a feedback/reporting tool. The name includes 'AxPlotToData' which distinguishes it from sibling feedback tools for other agents, though not explicitly differentiated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs 'Always call this after using any other tool,' providing clear when-to-use guidance. It also lists required fields and their expected content, leaving no ambiguity about how to invoke it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.