Skip to main content
Glama
Axiomatic-AI

axiomatic-mcp

Official
by Axiomatic-AI

Related Servers

Alternatives to axiomatic-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for syntx.ai AI platform that enables chat, image generation, model catalog, and account management through any MCP-compatible assistant.
      28
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for AiDocX, enabling AI assistants to create, upload, manage, and analyze business documents and presentation decks, with support for various document types and AI-powered generation.
      26
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects AI assistants to a local Wolfram Engine, enabling symbolic math, numerical analysis, and data visualization through Wolfram Language. It provides secure expression filtering, client authentication, and supports both local stdio and HTTP transports.
      2
      32
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with Ansys CFX through PyCFX, supporting natural-language-assisted CFX-Pre, CFX Solver, and CFD-Post workflows for setup, execution, and postprocessing.
      7
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple 'report_feedback' tools (7 total) across different subsystems all perform the same function, creating ambiguity about which to call after a given tool. 'generate_code' and 'execute_code' tools also overlap across subsystems (AxArgmin vs AxModelFitterV2). AxModelFitter and AxModelFitterV2 have overlapping purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'Ax[Subsystem]_[action]' pattern with snake_case verbs (e.g., AxModelFitter_fit_model, AxPlotToData_extract_numerical_series). No mixing of conventions across the entire tool set.

    Tool Count3/5

    23 tools is on the high side for a coherent server. The count is inflated by 7 nearly identical 'report_feedback' tools and duplicate 'execute_code' tools, suggesting poor scoping. However, the core capabilities (fitting, plotting, equation, document) could justify around 15-20 tools.

    Completeness3/5

    Model fitting has comprehensive diagnostics (R², AIC, cross-validation, covariance), but there are notable gaps: no data preprocessing, no visualization, and the two fitting workflows (direct fit via AxModelFitter vs code generation via AxModelFitterV2) are redundant. Equation and document tools are sparse.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive