Skip to main content
Glama
web-presence-audit

web-presence-audit

by AxRS37

Related Servers

Alternatives to web-presence-audit

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets agents collect a company's entire public marketing footprint from a single URL — paid ads, organic social, SEO, AI-crawler stance, Reddit and founder activity, tracking pixels, and funnel signals — and return a compact scorecard plus an evidence index with unknowns. It also exposes tools to pull the underlying ad copy, posts and media, retrieve the analysis playbook, diff two runs over time, and validate that a generated report's citations resolve without invented spend.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable agents to fetch public pages, extract business signals and FAQ content, score a local business's web presence from 0-10, and generate a sales-ready audit with ranked gaps and a recommended offer.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing SuperAudit’s free website audit as a callable tool, enabling AI agents to audit any public URL and receive scores across SEO, security, legal, performance, and more. No API key required; respects rate limits and caches results.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for GEO site audits, checking 31 signals across 6 pillars and returning a score, breakdowns, and actionable fix prompts.
      1
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Open-source MCP server that audits websites for AI search readiness, providing deterministic scoring (0-100) and prioritized fix lists for metrics like JSON-LD, llms.txt, heading hierarchy, and AI crawler access.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct check: form platform, tap-to-call, NAP consistency, website hygiene, and website discovery are all clearly separated by purpose. The only overlap is run_full_audit, which intentionally composes the others; its description clearly frames it as the complete composite, so an agent can still choose correctly.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are snake_case following a verb_noun pattern (check_form_platform, audit_website, find_website, run_full_audit). The verbs vary (check/audit/find/run) but the structural convention is consistent and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a focused web-presence audit: five atomic checks plus one composite orchestrator. Each tool earns its place with no redundancy or padding.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers website discovery, hygiene, form platform, tap-to-call, and NAP consistency, plus a full audit — solid lifecycle coverage for the domain. Minor gap: competitor/review checks are only reachable through run_full_audit rather than a standalone tool, but agents can still access them.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues