Skip to main content
Glama
AxRS37

web-presence-audit

by AxRS37

Related Servers

Alternatives to web-presence-audit

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing SuperAudit’s free website audit as a callable tool, enabling AI agents to audit any public URL and receive scores across SEO, security, legal, performance, and more. No API key required; respects rate limits and caches results.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for GEO site audits, checking 31 signals across 6 pillars and returning a score, breakdowns, and actionable fix prompts.
      1
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Open-source MCP server that audits websites for AI search readiness, providing deterministic scoring (0-100) and prioritized fix lists for metrics like JSON-LD, llms.txt, heading hierarchy, and AI crawler access.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      AutomateLab AI SEO Magic Button runs a whole-site AEO/GEO audit and generates a prioritized plan an agent can execute. It combines AI-SEO and Citation Intelligence and ships as a skill, plugin, and MCP server. Product and documentation: https://automatelab.tech/products/skills-and-plugins/ai-seo-magic-button/
      1
      6 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets an AI agent audit a page for SEO and GEO — on-page tags, structured data, robots.txt, sitemaps, hreflang, and whether ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini can actually crawl and cite you. No API keys required.
      17
      261 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct check: form platform, tap-to-call, NAP consistency, website hygiene, and website discovery are all clearly separated by purpose. The only overlap is run_full_audit, which intentionally composes the others; its description clearly frames it as the complete composite, so an agent can still choose correctly.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are snake_case following a verb_noun pattern (check_form_platform, audit_website, find_website, run_full_audit). The verbs vary (check/audit/find/run) but the structural convention is consistent and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a focused web-presence audit: five atomic checks plus one composite orchestrator. Each tool earns its place with no redundancy or padding.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers website discovery, hygiene, form platform, tap-to-call, and NAP consistency, plus a full audit — solid lifecycle coverage for the domain. Minor gap: competitor/review checks are only reachable through run_full_audit rather than a standalone tool, but agents can still access them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues