Backforms MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Backforms MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceOfficial MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for Iron.xyz API, designed to work with Claude Desktop, Cursor IDE and other MCP compatible clients.314 npm2MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that can be deployed locally via stdio or remotely via SSE/HTTP endpoints, supporting multiple MCP clients including VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and Claude Desktop.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceOfficial Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Cogniz Memory Platform. Enables AI assistants like Claude to store and retrieve memories across conversations.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server designed to easily dump your codebase context into Large Language Models (LLMs).13 npm3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn educational implementation of a Model Context Protocol server that demonstrates how to build a functional MCP server for integrating with various LLM clients like Claude Desktop.1162MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenancePersistent memory MCP server for Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot. Semantic search, Git sync, project-based, Persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot. Semantic search, Git sync, project-based organization, and team collaboration via Model Context Protocol.1188 npm2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Most tools target distinct resources and actions (create/list/update/delete form, get submissions, get details, test submission, workspace usage). Minor overlap exists between update_form_settings and setup_webhook (both tweak a form's configuration), and between get_form_details and get_form_submissions, but descriptions clearly separate config from data and add a slight risk of misselection.
All nine tools use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (create_form, list_forms, get_form_submissions, update_form_settings, delete_form, get_form_details, setup_webhook, send_test_submission, check_workspace_usage). The convention is predictable and readable throughout.
Nine tools is well-scoped for a serverless form backend, covering the create/read/update/delete lifecycle plus submissions, webhooks, testing, and usage. Each tool earns its place with no obvious redundancy.
Full form CRUD, submissions retrieval, webhook/email setup, test submission, and usage checking are covered, giving solid lifecycle support. The main gap is submission-level management (e.g., fetching or deleting an individual submission by ID/export), which agents may want but can partly work around.