Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to vibecheck

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Security scanner and MCP server that catches dangerous patterns in MCP servers and AI agent projects, such as leaked secrets, shell execution, and prompt-injection text. Runs as both a CLI and MCP server with CI-friendly severity gates.
      2
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Security scanner for MCP servers — vet an MCP before you wire it into an agent. Detects prompt-injection, credential exfiltration (via taint analysis), RCE, and supply-chain risks, and catches cross-server exfil chains no single server reveals. Zero-dependency local CLI, SARIF output, CI-gateable, no account.
      42 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI agents to scan code for leaked secrets, copyleft licenses, unprotected routes, missing privacy policies, and risky card handling before committing or shipping.
      50 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables scanning of AI agent code for security vulnerabilities such as prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration, directly from MCP-compatible clients like Claude Code.
      2
      LGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Real security scanners for AI coding agents — SAST (441 rules), secret detection (419+ patterns), dependency CVEs (OSV.dev), MCP/skill vetting, MITRE ATT&CK. Open-source, Rust, free
      7 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusing it with other tools. Agents will always select the correct tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    With a single tool, naming consistency is trivially maintained. The name 'scan' is a clear verb that matches its action.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool is on the low end for a server, but it is acceptable for a narrowly focused utility that performs one well-defined task. The tool covers a specific security scanning need without requiring multiple operations.

    Completeness3/5

    The one tool handles the primary scanning operation with configurable output levels, but lacks supporting tools for managing scan history, configurations, or results. It covers the core function but leaves gaps for typical workflows.