Dev.to MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Dev.to MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA production-ready MCP server for the DEV Community (Forem) API, enabling management of articles, comments, users, tags, organizations, reading list, and followers through any MCP-compatible client.165 npm5MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for DEV.to (Forem API) built with Python and FastMCP.12-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with the Dev.to platform through MCP tools, including article search, retrieval, and creation.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides MCP tools to interact with Dev.to, enabling searching, browsing, and publishing articles through natural language.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants like Claude to interact with Substack newsletters, allowing for post retrieval, content searching, and author information access through a standardized interface.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis is a complete MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that implements a articles of dev.to with robust validation using TypeScript and Zod. The server integrates directly with Cursor, allowing you search articles on dev.to.3 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes targeting different operations (create, get, update, search), but there is some ambiguity between get_article_by_id and get_article_details which appear to serve similar retrieval functions. The other tools are clearly differentiated by their target data or action.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case throughout (e.g., create_article, get_articles_by_tag, update_article). The naming is predictable and follows a clear convention without any deviations in style or structure.
With 10 tools, this server is well-scoped for managing Dev.to content, covering core operations like CRUD for articles, user info retrieval, and various query methods. Each tool serves a specific purpose without bloat, making the count appropriate for the domain.
The toolset provides comprehensive coverage for article management (create, read, update, search) and user information, but lacks delete functionality for articles, which is a minor gap. Core workflows are supported, and agents can likely work around the missing delete operation.