Dev.to MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_latest_articlesB | Get the latest articles from Dev.to |
| get_top_articlesB | Get the top articles from Dev.to |
| get_articles_by_tagC | Get articles by tag from Dev.to |
| get_article_by_idC | Get a specific article by ID from Dev.to |
| search_articlesB | |
| get_article_detailsC | |
| get_articles_by_usernameC | |
| get_user_infoC | |
| create_articleB | |
| update_articleB | |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes targeting different operations (create, get, update, search), but there is some ambiguity between get_article_by_id and get_article_details which appear to serve similar retrieval functions. The other tools are clearly differentiated by their target data or action.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case throughout (e.g., create_article, get_articles_by_tag, update_article). The naming is predictable and follows a clear convention without any deviations in style or structure.
With 10 tools, this server is well-scoped for managing Dev.to content, covering core operations like CRUD for articles, user info retrieval, and various query methods. Each tool serves a specific purpose without bloat, making the count appropriate for the domain.
The toolset provides comprehensive coverage for article management (create, read, update, search) and user information, but lacks delete functionality for articles, which is a minor gap. Core workflows are supported, and agents can likely work around the missing delete operation.