get_sketchfab_status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions a returned message but does not describe the message format, possible values (e.g., enabled/disabled), or whether any state changes occur. No side effects or permissions are disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no wasted words. Could be improved by using bullet points or grouping, but is very concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool and the existence of many sibling status-checking tools, the description lacks detail about what 'enabled' means, the role of 'user_prompt', and the expected return value. No output schema, so return format is unspecified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one optional parameter 'user_prompt' with default '' and no description. The tool description does not mention this parameter at all, adding no meaning beyond the schema. With 0% schema coverage, the description should compensate but fails completely.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it checks if Sketchfab integration is enabled, with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like get_polyhaven_status by naming Sketchfab, but does not elaborate on what 'enabled' means or how the result is presented.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like get_hunyuan3d_status or when not to use. No context about prerequisites or typical scenarios is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.