Swedish Law MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Swedish Law MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides MCP tools for searching and retrieving Swedish legislation, case law, and preparatory works from a cached legal dataset.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying 6,870 German federal statutes, case law, and legislative preparatory works directly from AI assistants and MCP-compatible clients.86 npm4Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables querying over 3,200 Dutch statutes (AVG, Wetboek van Strafrecht, Burgerlijk Wetboek, etc.) with verbatim, citation-grounded text from official sources, directly from MCP-compatible AI assistants.1848 npm13Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search and retrieve consolidated Swedish statutes (SFS) from the Riksdagen open data API, with verifiable citations and persistent identifiers.4Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that exposes Austrian federal law (Bundesrecht) to LLMs, enabling full-text search, paragraph retrieval, historical versions, statute lookup, BGBl lookups, amendment timelines, and citation searches via the public RIS OGD API.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables LLMs to query and retrieve real-time open data, documents, protocols, and records from the Swedish Parliament (Riksdag) and Government Offices through 32 specialized MCP tools.31-
TDQS
Scored across 19 tools
Every tool has a clear, distinct purpose with explicit cross-references and warnings to prevent misuse. For example, `search_legislation` and `search_case_law` are separated, and `get_provision` is not used for keyword search.
18 of 19 tools follow verb_noun pattern (e.g., `get_provision`, `search_legislation`, `validate_citation`). The sole exception is `about`, which is a common server metadata endpoint.
19 tools comprehensively cover Swedish legal research including statutes, case law, preparatory works, EU implementation, citations, validation, and history. Each tool earns its place without redundancy.
Core workflows are well-covered: search, retrieve provisions, validate, format, get history/diffs. Minor gap: no dedicated tool to retrieve full statute text or detailed case law document, but search and provision tools likely suffice for most use cases.