Swedish Law MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Swedish Law MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides MCP tools for searching and retrieving Swedish legislation, case law, and preparatory works from a cached legal dataset.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables natural-language search, citation validation, and cross-referencing of Irish statutes and EU law through MCP-compatible clients.84 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to look up Danish legislation by name or free text from Retsinformation, retrieve verbatim section text with official ELI links, and inspect status and later amendments. It also flags historical documents and unconsolidated amendments so returned legal text can be verified.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying 6,870 German federal statutes, case law, and legislative preparatory works directly from AI assistants and MCP-compatible clients.100 npm4Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables querying over 3,200 Dutch statutes (AVG, Wetboek van Strafrecht, Burgerlijk Wetboek, etc.) with verbatim, citation-grounded text from official sources, directly from MCP-compatible AI assistants.1860 npm14Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search and retrieve consolidated Swedish statutes (SFS) from the Riksdagen open data API, with verifiable citations and persistent identifiers.4Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 19 tools
Every tool has a clear, distinct purpose with explicit cross-references and warnings to prevent misuse. For example, `search_legislation` and `search_case_law` are separated, and `get_provision` is not used for keyword search.
18 of 19 tools follow verb_noun pattern (e.g., `get_provision`, `search_legislation`, `validate_citation`). The sole exception is `about`, which is a common server metadata endpoint.
19 tools comprehensively cover Swedish legal research including statutes, case law, preparatory works, EU implementation, citations, validation, and history. Each tool earns its place without redundancy.
Core workflows are well-covered: search, retrieve provisions, validate, format, get history/diffs. Minor gap: no dedicated tool to retrieve full statute text or detailed case law document, but search and provision tools likely suffice for most use cases.