quote_sticker

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that messages are sent to an external bot's server, and mentions download option and timeout parameter, which reveals key behavioral traits. No annotations exist, so description carries the burden and handles it well.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two clear paragraphs: main action then parameter list. Every sentence adds value, no redundancy. Efficient and front-loaded with the core purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, external dependency, parameters, and download behavior. An output schema exists, so the description need not explain return values. Almost complete, missing only usage guidelines.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description compensates fully by explaining each parameter: chat (source chat), message_ids (IDs to stickerize), download (download .webp if true), timeout_seconds (seconds to wait for reply). Adds significant meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: forwarding messages to @QuotLyBot to generate a quote sticker and return the result. The verb 'forward' and resource 'message' plus the specific bot name make the purpose explicit and distinct from siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes a warning that message content is sent to a third-party server, implying privacy awareness, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over others or provide alternative approaches. Lacks clear usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.