get_common_chats
Find shared groups and channels between you and a specific Telegram user.
Instructions
列出自己和某个用户共同所在的群 / 频道。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user | Yes | ||
| limit | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Find shared groups and channels between you and a specific Telegram user.
列出自己和某个用户共同所在的群 / 频道。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user | Yes | ||
| limit | No |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions 'list' implying read-only, but lacks details on pagination, permissions, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence, concise and front-loaded, but lacks sufficient detail for a full understanding.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 2 parameters with no schema descriptions and an output schema present, the description is too brief; it omits parameter details and return value explanation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the description does not explain 'user' or 'limit' parameters, missing the chance to clarify user format or limit behavior.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists common groups/channels with another user, using specific verb 'list' and resource 'common chats', distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_dialogs.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_dialogs or get_chat_info; no when-not-to-use or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Anonymouse8882/TelegamMCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server