Skip to main content
Glama
Aniket-Sharma27

component-mcp-server

design-system-mcp

A standalone Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that exposes design system component documentation to LLM clients. It reads Markdown files with YAML frontmatter from contexts/ and serves them over three MCP tools — get_guidelines, list_components, and get_component_context — so an LLM can look up the cross-cutting API/styling rules and a real component's props and events before generating code against it.

This guide covers deploying it standalone (no Docker) to a fresh AWS EC2 instance, running under PM2.

1. What this service is

  • An MCP server, reachable over HTTP, that answers three questions for an LLM client: "what rules and practices apply to every component, regardless of which one I use?" (get_guidelines), "what components are documented?" (list_components), and "give me everything you know about component X" (get_component_context).

  • get_guidelines takes no arguments and returns contexts/_guidelines.md verbatim — three things in one call: component API conventions (event handling via CustomEvent/.detail, boolean prop syntax, element-vs-service APIs, item/group component pairs, theming), styling practices (e.g. dimension/background defaults, typography tokens being composite font shorthand values rather than standalone font-size/font-weight, no margin tokens — use padding/gap instead), and the full contextual (--ion-cont-*) design token catalog for color, spacing, sizing, border-radius, border-width, shadow, typography, motion, opacity, and layout. It exists so components get built against real API conventions and styling work never falls back to raw values (hex, px), literal (--ion-lit-*) tokens, or a token applied the wrong way. Some token entries are marked (auto) in the source file — their description was generated from the token name because the underlying CSS had no comment for it (mostly in the spacing/sizing/layout sections). The token names are exact and verified; treat (auto) descriptions as unverified until a human reviews them against Figma/source.

  • get_guidelines merges what used to be two separate tools (get_conventions and get_styling_rules/get_tokens) — both were "call once per session before writing code," and splitting them only helps if some sessions need one but not the other, which isn't the case here. It's meant to be called once per session, before any component-specific lookup or styling work — list_components' and get_guidelines' own tool descriptions say so, so a well-behaved client calls it first without being told.

  • Stateless: every /mcp request spins up a fresh MCP server + transport internally, so it's safe to run behind a load balancer with multiple concurrent clients and no session affinity required.

  • Read-only against contexts/ — there's no database, no write path; updating documentation means editing/adding a Markdown file in that directory (see §9). contexts/_guidelines.md is the exception to "every file in contexts/ is a component" — it's a shared reference doc, not a component, and is excluded from list_components' output and from validate_component.py's per-component schema checks (any file starting with _ is skipped by both).

Related MCP server: Markdown RAG MCP

2. Prerequisites

  • Node.js 18 or later (LTS recommended — 20.x or newer). The build uses NodeNext module resolution and ES2022 target, which need a reasonably current Node.

  • npm (ships with Node).

  • PM2, installed globally on the instance:

    npm install -g pm2

3. Environment variables

Copy .env.example to .env and fill in real values — or export the same variables directly in the shell/systemd unit that starts PM2 (PM2 does not read .env files itself unless you load them into the shell first; see §5).

Variable

Required

Purpose

How to set it

API_KEY

Yes — the server exits immediately at startup if this is unset

Bearer token that every /mcp request must present in Authorization: Bearer <value>. This is the only thing standing between the internet and your component docs, so it must be a real secret, not a memorable string.

Generate a random 32-byte hex token: openssl rand -hex 32. Store the result somewhere your deploy process can read it (a secrets manager, an untracked .env, or an EC2 instance's environment) — never commit it to git.

PORT

No (defaults to 3000)

TCP port the Node process listens on.

Pick anything free on the instance; 3000 is fine if nothing else uses it. Combined with the reverse proxy in §7, this port should only ever be reached from localhost, never exposed directly to the internet.

4. Install and build

From the repo root, in order:

npm install
npm run build

npm run build runs tsc and compiles src/ to dist/. Confirm it produced output:

ls dist/
# expect: http.js  index.js  server.js  tools/

The HTTP entrypoint is dist/http.js.

5. Starting the server under PM2

Export the environment variables from §3 into the shell before starting PM2 — PM2 captures and persists the environment of the process that starts it, reusing it on subsequent restart/resurrect:

export API_KEY=$(cat /path/to/your/secret)   # or however you're sourcing it
export PORT=3000

pm2 start ecosystem.config.cjs

The config file is ecosystem.config.cjs (not .js) — this package is "type": "module" in package.json, and PM2's config loader needs CommonJS, so .cjs is required, not a style choice.

Confirm it's actually running:

pm2 list
# expect a row for "design-system-mcp" with status "online"

pm2 logs design-system-mcp --lines 20
# expect: "design-system-mcp (Streamable HTTP) listening on port 3000"

Surviving an instance reboot

Starting it once isn't enough — by default PM2 doesn't survive a reboot. Set up both of these, once:

pm2 save                # snapshots the current process list
pm2 startup              # prints an OS-specific command
# copy/paste and run the command pm2 startup prints, as root (e.g. via sudo) —
# this registers a systemd (or equivalent) service that resurrects
# "pm2 save"'s snapshot on boot

After any future change to what's running under PM2 (new app, changed env, etc.), re-run pm2 save so the snapshot stays current.

Other PM2 commands you'll use

Action

Command

Stop

pm2 stop design-system-mcp

Restart (drops in-flight connections)

pm2 restart design-system-mcp

Reload (zero-downtime)

pm2 reload design-system-mcp

Remove from PM2 entirely

pm2 delete design-system-mcp

Tail logs

pm2 logs design-system-mcp

Logs also land in logs/out.log and logs/error.log in the repo root (gitignored), independent of pm2 logs.

6. Verifying it's working

A process showing "online" in pm2 list only proves Node is alive — it doesn't prove the service actually works. Do both of these:

Health check (confirms contexts/ is present and readable, not just that the process exists):

curl -s http://localhost:3000/health
# expect: {"status":"ok","components":20}
# (component count will match whatever's actually in contexts/)

A 503 here means contexts/ is missing or unreadable — investigate before moving on.

A real end-to-end MCP call — this exercises the actual tool logic, not just connectivity:

curl -s -X POST http://localhost:3000/mcp \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "Accept: application/json, text/event-stream" \
  -d '{
    "jsonrpc": "2.0",
    "id": 1,
    "method": "tools/call",
    "params": {
      "name": "get_component_context",
      "arguments": { "componentName": "button" }
    }
  }'

Expect a text/event-stream response containing the button component's frontmatter, body, and raw content.

get_guidelines — same idea, no arguments:

curl -s -X POST http://localhost:3000/mcp \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "Accept: application/json, text/event-stream" \
  -d '{
    "jsonrpc": "2.0",
    "id": 1,
    "method": "tools/call",
    "params": {
      "name": "get_guidelines",
      "arguments": {}
    }
  }'

Expect the full contents of contexts/_guidelines.md back verbatim — API conventions (events/.detail, boolean props, apiTypes, relatedComponents, theming), styling practices (dimension/background defaults, typography-shorthand and no-margin-tokens notes), and the token catalog (border-radius/width, color, shadow, motion, opacity, sizing, spacing, layout, typography). Also confirm list_components doesn't include _guidelines in its output — it's a shared reference doc, not a component.

As a functional check, ask the connected coding assistant to build a form or similar UI and confirm: (a) it calls get_guidelines exactly once, without being reminded; (b) it doesn't set an explicit width/max-width/height/background-color on the outer container (those should come from the design system's own defaults per the styling practices in _guidelines.md, not be hardcoded); and (c) it uses the typography shorthand token and a padding/gap token for text sizing and vertical spacing — not raw font-size/margin values, and not a token named margin-* (there isn't one).

If you'd rather click through any of these interactively, point the MCP Inspector at http://localhost:3000/mcp with the same bearer token.

Also confirm auth is actually enforced — this should return 401, not the component data:

curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}\n" -X POST http://localhost:3000/mcp \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"ping"}'
# expect: 401

7. TLS/HTTPS — required before any public exposure

This server speaks plain HTTP only. It does not terminate TLS itself. Do not point a public DNS record or security-group rule directly at port 3000 — put a reverse proxy in front that handles HTTPS, and only expose that.

The simplest option is Caddy: it gets you automatic HTTPS via Let's Encrypt with a few lines of config and no manual certificate renewal.

# Install Caddy (Debian/Ubuntu example — see caddyserver.com for other distros)
sudo apt install -y debian-keyring debian-archive-keyring apt-transport-https
curl -1sLf 'https://dl.cloudsmith.io/public/caddy/stable/gpg.key' | sudo gpg --dearmor -o /usr/share/keyrings/caddy-stable-archive-keyring.gpg
curl -1sLf 'https://dl.cloudsmith.io/public/caddy/stable/debian.deb.txt' | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/caddy-stable.list
sudo apt update && sudo apt install caddy

Minimal Caddyfile (typically /etc/caddy/Caddyfile):

component-docs.yourdomain.com {
    reverse_proxy localhost:3000
}

Reload Caddy after editing:

sudo systemctl reload caddy

That's it — Caddy provisions and renews the Let's Encrypt certificate automatically as long as the domain's DNS points at this instance and ports 80/443 are open in your security group. Clients then connect to https://component-docs.yourdomain.com/mcp, never to the bare Node port.

8. Security notes

  • Rate limiting is enabled: /mcp allows 100 requests/minute per IP; /health allows 300/minute (it's expected to be polled more often by uptime checks).

  • Bearer token auth is required on all /mcp requests (POST, GET, DELETE) — a missing or incorrect Authorization header gets a 401, never a peek at component data. /health does not require auth (it reveals no component content, just a readiness signal).

  • The API_KEY value is the shared secret every consuming team needs. Distribute it out-of-band (a secrets manager, a password manager entry, a DM) — never in a committed config file, a Slack message that gets indexed, or a public repo. Rotate it by updating the deployed environment variable and restarting PM2 with pm2 restart design-system-mcp --update-env (after re-exporting the new API_KEY — see §5), then redistributing the new value to consumers.

    --update-env is not optional here. PM2 caches the environment a process was originally started with and reuses it on a plain restart, even if you've re-exported a new value in your shell first — the old key keeps working and the new one is rejected until you pass --update-env to force PM2 to reread the environment. Confirmed by testing directly: after re-exporting API_KEY and running plain pm2 restart, the old key still returned 200 and the new key returned 401; re-running with pm2 restart design-system-mcp --update-env reversed both — old key 401, new key 200.

9. Adding or updating a component

  1. Gather the component's full source material (Angular source, TS interfaces, design tokens, docs, Storybook stories, usage samples).

  2. Feed extraction-prompt.md to an LLM along with that material. It produces a single Markdown file (YAML frontmatter + body) in the format the rest of contexts/ uses.

  3. Save it as contexts/<componentName>.md.

  4. Run the validator — this is mandatory, not optional:

    python3 validate_component.py contexts/<componentName>.md

    A new or updated component file is not considered done until this exits 0. Fix every blocking issue it reports and re-run. Review warnings too — they're not always errors, but each should be a deliberate, explainable choice, not something overlooked.

  5. No deploy or restart needed — contexts/ is read at request time, so the change is live as soon as the file is saved on the running instance.

10. How teams connect once deployed

The server speaks MCP Streamable HTTP at POST https://<your-deployed-host>/mcp (through the reverse proxy from §7), authenticated with the shared bearer token from §8.

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http component-docs https://<your-deployed-host>/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer <API_KEY>"

Or directly in .mcp.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "component-docs": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://<your-deployed-host>/mcp",
      "headers": {
        "Authorization": "Bearer <API_KEY>"
      }
    }
  }
}

opencode

{
  "mcp": {
    "component-docs": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://<your-deployed-host>/mcp",
      "headers": {
        "Authorization": "Bearer <API_KEY>"
      },
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}

Replace <your-deployed-host> with the real domain from §7 and <API_KEY> with the real token from §3 — never commit either into a shared config file.

Available Tools

2 tools
get_component_contextA

Looks up contexts/.md (case-insensitive) and returns its parsed frontmatter, raw markdown body, and full raw file content. If the component isn't found, returns an error listing the currently available component names.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
componentNameYesThe name of the component to fetch context for, e.g. 'button'

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It transparently explains the lookup is case-insensitive, the return structure (frontmatter, body, raw file), and error behavior. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence efficiently conveys all essential information: action, file path, case-insensitivity, return structure, and error handling. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has one parameter and no output schema, but description fully explains what the tool does and what it returns, including edge case. Complete for its simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% description coverage for the single required parameter. The description adds no additional semantic detail beyond the schema's example and definition. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool retrieves a component's context from a file, returning frontmatter, markdown body, and raw content. It also specifies error handling. This distinguishes it from sibling list_components, which lists components.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description tells when to use (to fetch component context) and what happens on error (lists available components). It does not explicitly say when not to use, but the context is clear for a simple lookup tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list_componentsA

Scans the contexts/ directory and returns the names of all available design system components (without the .md extension), so a caller can discover what's available before requesting details.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description fully describes the behavior: scans a directory, returns names without .md extension. It is transparent about the operation, though it could mention read-only nature or performance characteristics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no wasted words, front-loaded with the core action. Highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple discovery tool with no output schema, the description completely explains what is returned and why. No gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter info but does not need to. Baseline 4 for 0 params.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (scans, returns) and the resource (design system component names from contexts/ directory). It distinguishes from sibling get_component_context by framing this as a discovery step before requesting details.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use: before requesting details with get_component_context. It provides clear context but does not explicitly state when not to use or list alternatives beyond the sibling.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one lists available components, the other retrieves detailed content for a specific component. There is no overlap or ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (list_components, get_component_context), making the naming predictable and clear.

Tool Count3/5

With only two tools, the server feels minimal but still covers basic discovery and retrieval. However, for a server named 'component-mcp-server', a few more tools (e.g., search or create) might be expected, so the count is borderline.

Completeness2/5

The server only supports reading components (list and get). Missing create, update, and delete operations leave significant gaps for full component lifecycle management, limiting its usefulness for agents needing to modify components.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessSyncing

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server that exposes the @bunge/ds-components design system catalog, allowing AI assistants to list, search, and retrieve component details including inputs, outputs, usage examples, and import instructions.
    4
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides semantic search over markdown documentation using RAG, allowing natural language queries and integration with MCP clients.
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides resources, tools, and prompts for a Design System via MCP protocol, enabling component search, reading, and related component discovery.
    225
    MIT

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Aniket-Sharma27/component-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server