OrchestKit Docs MCP
Server Details
Read-only MCP server for the OrchestKit docs: full-text search + Markdown fetch. No auth.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- yonatangross/orchestkit
- GitHub Stars
- 186
Glama MCP Gateway
Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.
Full call logging
Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.
Tool access control
Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.
Managed credentials
Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.
Usage analytics
See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.
Tool Definition Quality
Average 4.4/5 across 2 of 2 tools scored.
Each tool has a distinct purpose: search to find pages, get to retrieve content. No overlap.
Both tools follow the same 'orchestkit_docs_verb' pattern consistently.
Only two tools is minimal, but for a simple documentation retrieval scope it is acceptable. However, it feels thin.
Covers the basic workflow of searching and getting pages. Missing features like listing all pages or indexing, but search handles discovery.
Available Tools
2 toolsorchestkit_docs_getARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Fetch one OrchestKit documentation page as Markdown. Use after orchestkit_docs_search to read a page in full. Input: the page path (e.g. '/docs/getting-started/installation'). Returns the page Markdown.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | Page path, e.g. /docs/getting-started/installation |
Tool Definition Quality
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate readOnly, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior. Description adds that the output is Markdown, which is beyond the annotations. No contradictions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences with no wasted words. The purpose and usage are front-loaded. Highly concise and structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple one-parameter tool with no output schema, the description fully covers input, output format, and relationship to sibling tool. No gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The parameter 'path' is already fully described in the schema (100% coverage). The description provides an example but adds minimal new meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool fetches one documentation page as Markdown and distinguishes itself from the sibling search tool by noting it is used after orchestkit_docs_search.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly says to use after orchestkit_docs_search, providing a clear workflow. Could be improved by also stating when not to use, but the guidance is sufficient.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
orchestkit_docs_searchARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Search the OrchestKit documentation. Use this first to find the right page for a question. Input: a query string. Returns a ranked list of pages with titles and URLs.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | What to search for. |
Tool Definition Quality
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and no destructiveness. The description adds the behavioral detail that it returns a ranked list of pages with titles and URLs, which is useful context beyond the schema. No contradictions; slight additional value.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Three sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, followed by usage order and input/output summary. Every sentence earns its place with zero redundancy or filler.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given a simple search tool with one parameter, full schema coverage, no output schema, and no nested objects, the description covers what it does, when to use it, the input, and the output format. Nothing essential is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% and the parameter 'query' is adequately described in the schema. The description merely restates 'Input: a query string,' adding no new semantic information beyond what the schema already provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Search' and the resource 'OrchestKit documentation', distinguishing it from the sibling tool orchestkit_docs_get, which likely retrieves a specific page. The purpose is unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly advises to 'Use this first to find the right page for a question,' providing clear guidance on when to invoke this tool versus the sibling tool orchestkit_docs_get, which would be used afterward.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Claim this connector by publishing a /.well-known/glama.json file on your server's domain with the following structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"maintainers": [{ "email": "your-email@example.com" }]
}The email address must match the email associated with your Glama account. Once published, Glama will automatically detect and verify the file within a few minutes.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for markdown files — search, extract sections, list headings, find code blocks across docs.6895MIT
- Alicense-qualityBmaintenanceRead-only, unauthenticated remote MCP server for public Wavedash docs, providing SDK guidance, engine setup help, and publishing checklists for agents.MIT
- Alicense-qualityDmaintenanceGeneric MCP server that exposes Markdown documentation to LLMs, enabling them to search and answer questions about any software documentation.MIT
- Alicense-qualityDmaintenanceMCP server for managing product documentation as markdown files. Supports creating, reading, updating, deleting, and searching docs with optional semantic search.79MIT