Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to bleurs

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for verification and API-existence oracle tools, enabling AI agents to check package existence, symbol details, and version diffs with signed attestations.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides tools to fetch live, version-accurate documentation, changelogs, examples, and method signatures for npm and PyPI packages, preventing AI coding agents from hallucinating stale APIs.
      5 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI coding agents real-time access to the public-apis dataset, enabling search, live probing, and code snippet generation for 1,500+ free public APIs.
      7
      19 npm
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes Pyright language server functionality for Python, providing tools for type checking, code completions, and finding definitions. It enables AI models to perform static analysis and code formatting through the Model Context Protocol.
      7
      24 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables AI models to analyze local Python codebases using abstract syntax trees, providing tools for file structure analysis, symbol search, import graphing, docstring auditing, and refactoring prompts without loading entire source files into context.
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools have distinct purposes: surface provides API signatures, context expands to include dependency closure, and verify checks for invalid references. There is slight overlap between surface and context (both return APIs), but descriptions make the difference clear.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names are single lowercase verbs (surface, context, verify), which is a consistent style, but they do not follow a more informative verb_noun pattern. The naming is predictable in form but somewhat vague in conveying domain.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is at the lower end of the ideal range but each tool is substantial and covers a distinct need. The count feels appropriate for a focused Python code intelligence server.

    Completeness4/5

    The domain of Python code analysis is well covered: surface for understanding API, context for editing with dependencies, and verify for validating references before writing. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit search or exploration tool), but they are not critical for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues