Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP-REPL

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides secure execution of arbitrary JavaScript code within a sandboxed QuickJS WASM environment, allowing language models or other MCP clients to safely run JavaScript code snippets without compromising the host system.
      4
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A secure Node.js execution environment that allows coding agents and LLMs to run JavaScript dynamically, install NPM packages, and retrieve results while adhering to the Model Control Protocol.
      7
      101 npm
      4
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables running arbitrary JavaScript code in isolated Docker containers with on-the-fly npm dependency installation, supporting both ephemeral one-shot executions and persistent sandbox environments.
      101 npm
      157
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A secure Model Context Protocol server that allows AI assistants and LLM applications to safely execute Python and JavaScript code snippets in containerized environments.
      2
      204
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides sandboxed code execution for AI agents with support for Python, JavaScript, and shell commands. Includes comprehensive safety features like destructive pattern blocking, timeout protection, and restricted file access for secure production use.
      7 npm
      65 PyPI
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The single tool 'execute' has a clear, distinct purpose that cannot be confused with any other tool in this set.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Since there is only one tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The tool name 'execute' follows a simple verb pattern, and there are no other tools to compare it against for inconsistency.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is generally too few for a server's purpose, as it limits functionality and flexibility. While the tool is versatile (supporting multiple languages and shell commands), the server likely has a broader scope (e.g., code execution and testing) that could benefit from additional tools for tasks like debugging, logging, or result analysis.

    Completeness2/5

    The server appears to be focused on code execution and testing, but with only one tool, there are significant gaps in coverage. For example, there are no tools for managing execution environments, handling dependencies, validating code, or analyzing results, which are common needs in such domains.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues