Skip to main content
Glama
AnChainAI
by AnChainAI

Related Servers

Alternatives to anchain-data-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to access real-time on-chain crypto analytics, whale tracking, and market metrics through natural language queries. It provides access to over 245 endpoints for comprehensive data analysis of assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and stablecoins.
      7
      6 npm
      7
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access real-time crypto risk intelligence with two tools: Flare for precursor detection and Core for overall risk environment assessment.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to interact with blockchain data across multiple chains (Ethereum, BSC, Polygon, Avalanche, etc.) via Ankr's Advanced API, supporting NFT, token, and query operations.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform AML and compliance risk scoring for crypto addresses and transactions on Ethereum, BSC, TRON, TON, and Bitcoin, returning 0–100 risk scores, bands, flags, and detailed signals.
      2
      64 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform blockchain operations like wallet management, token info, DeFi swaps, cross-chain bridging, and price checking across Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Solana.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources or actions, such as address labeling, risk scoring, transaction details, and sanctions database searches. However, certain tools like get_transaction_detail and get_contract_transaction may be confused, though descriptions provide some clarity.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming patterns are mixed: most tools use get_ or search_ prefixes, but there are deviations like bulk_address_label, auto_trace_address, and fuzzy_search_ofac. The lack of a uniform verb_noun structure makes the set slightly inconsistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 20 tools, the server is somewhat heavy but not excessive for its dual focus on blockchain analytics and sanctions screening. Several tools are near-duplicates (exact vs. fuzzy search, bulk vs. single address), which could be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core workflows, including address analytics, risk scoring, transaction tracing, and sanctions screening. Gaps include batch sanctions screening and comprehensive address transaction history, but these are not critical for the server's apparent purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive