No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 19 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: get_* tools each fetch a specific entity (products, platforms, keys, flavors, release plans, build info), and log tools (download, search, tail, range) have clearly separated purposes. Even the two potentially overlapping tools (get_build_info vs get_failed_tasks) are distinct—one gives an overview, the other focuses specifically on failures. No two tools could be confused.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., get_build_info, create_build, read_log_tail, search_builds). Verbs are descriptive and nouns reference the subject clearly. There are no mixed conventions or vague names like 'process' or 'do_thing'.
At 19 tools, the server is on the heavier side but each tool serves a clear function within the build system domain. The count is justified by the breadth of operations (create/build, sign, release planning, log inspection, search). It does not feel bloated, though it is slightly above the typical 'sweet spot' of 10-15 tools.
The tool surface covers the full build lifecycle: creation, status retrieval, signing, failed-task inspection, log analysis, release plan creation, and search. Log tools are particularly thorough (search, tail, range, list). The only missing operation—commit_release—is explicitly blocked for safety, not an oversight. There are no dead ends; every workflow has the necessary supporting tools.