list_rack_storages

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'Get a list' which implies a read operation, but gives no information about pagination, ordering, filtering behavior, permissions, or return format. This is minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with no redundancy. It is a single grammatically complete sentence, but it sacrifices useful detail. It is appropriately concise for its minimal content, though not as comprehensive as it could be.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 7 parameters and no schema descriptions, annotations, or output schema, the description is severely incomplete. It does not explain the returned data, available filters, or when to use this listing tool instead of individual retrieval tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 7 parameters with 0% description coverage, and the description does not mention any of them. It fails to explain what height, max_width, min_width, company_id, etc. mean or how they affect the list. The description provides zero value for parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (get/list) and resource (Rack Storages), distinguishing it from singular get_rack_storage and other rack storage operations. It is specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that it lists all storages or that parameters can filter results, nor does it contrast with list_rack_storage_items or get_rack_storage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.