delete_asset_password

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations available, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states 'Delete' without indicating whether the deletion is permanent, whether it requires permissions, or if there are side effects. This is a significant gap for a destructive operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, succinct sentence that is front-loaded with the verb 'Delete.' It is appropriately sized for the simplicity of the tool, with no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the tool is simple, the presence of sibling tools like archive_asset_password and unarchive_asset_password makes the one-line description incomplete. It does not clarify that this is a permanent deletion as opposed to archiving, which is essential for correct tool selection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one parameter 'id' with no description (0% coverage). The description adds that the operation is 'by ID,' which is a minimal cue, but it does not explain what the ID refers to or any constraints, leaving the agent with little extra understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (delete) and resource (Password) with a method (by ID). It is specific enough to distinguish from sibling tools like archive_asset_password, though it relies on the tool name for the 'asset' context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of the distinction between delete and archive/unarchive, which are sibling tools, so the agent is left without decision-making context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.