Skip to main content
Glama
Alien6-Studio

OuterSpace Apizr

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to OuterSpace Apizr

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to turn any API, CLI, database, website, SDK, or codebase into a production-ready MCP server with secure, dynamically discoverable capabilities.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and MCP-enabled clients to discover and call application capabilities exposed as structured, schema-defined tools, with input validation, error handling, and API/database integration. It also ships a sample client that demonstrates secure tool execution and seamless AI-agent interoperability.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A graph-based codebase capability discovery engine for LLM agents, exposing indexed code symbols, signatures, and relationships over MCP to enable agents to find and use tools without guessing names.
      9
      BSD 3-Clause
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents and developers to parse Python source into ASTs and compute complexity metrics that pinpoint refactoring hotspots, dead code, and breaking API diffs. It returns decomposition plans and dependency-graph telemetry over MCP, keeping token usage low with zero external dependencies.
      7
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Convert plain Python modules into MCP servers without decorators or boilerplate, automatically exposing functions as schematized tools.
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct phase: discovery (analyze), policy assessment (readiness), proposal testing (plan_exposure), and experiment history (list/show/diff). Boundaries are explicitly spelled out in the descriptions, though analyze and readiness both inspect the same capability space, which could cause occasional selection confusion.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names share a clean apizr_ prefix and snake_case, but the verb/no-un structure is mixed: single verbs (analyze), nouns (readiness), and noun_verb compounds (plan_exposure, experiment_list, experiment_show). Mostly consistent with minor deviation in the base convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for the server's purpose, covering discovery, readiness, exposure planning, and an experiment list/show/diff trio. Each tool clearly earns its place with no redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The static-analysis-to-exposure-planning workflow (analyze -> readiness -> plan_exposure) and experiment inspection (list/show/diff) appear well covered. Gaps are minor, since exposure execution and server generation are intentionally out of scope for this read-only/inspection surface.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessWithin a week