dream

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Given no annotations, the description discloses side effects ('may archive low-value entries and generate insight memories') and outlines the four-step cycle. It does not detail reversibility or potential data loss, but transparency is adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no wasted words. The first sentence defines the action and steps; the second provides side effects and usage context. Front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description explains the tool's purpose, steps, and when to use, but lacks information about return values (no output schema) and prerequisites. Adequate but not fully comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the tool description does not add meaning beyond what is already in the input schema for scope and force. Per the rubric, baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool runs a 'full memory consolidation cycle' with explicit steps (Orient, Gather, Consolidate, Prune), distinguishing it from more specific sibling tools like distill_memory or memory_lint.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear when-to-use guidance: 'Use when memory count is high and you need periodic maintenance.' However, it does not mention alternatives or when not to use, which would improve differentiation among siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.