Skip to main content
Glama
AlgoChains

AlgoChains MCP Server

Official
by AlgoChains

get_user_bot_metrics

Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve live metrics for a trading bot linked to a user subscription, with fallback states for connection or data issues.

Instructions

Get metrics for a specific bot in the context of a user's subscription. Returns live metrics or appropriate fallback state (broker_not_connected, metrics_pending, data_stale).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bot_idYesBot identifier (mnq, cl, mes, nq, or marketplace UUID)
user_idYes
log_pathNoOptional custom log path for self-hosted bots
subscription_idYes
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds value beyond annotations by stating it returns live metrics or fallback states (broker_not_connected, metrics_pending, data_stale). Annotations already indicate read-only and idempotent, so this is helpful behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that conveys purpose and return behavior without any extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 parameters and no output schema, the description explains the return values but lacks detail on what metrics are actually returned or how to interpret them. Adequate but not fully comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 50%, but the description provides no additional parameter details. It does not explain the role of user_id or subscription_id, nor compensate for the missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get metrics for a specific bot in the context of a user's subscription', which is a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from the sibling 'get_all_bot_metrics' by emphasizing 'specific bot', though it does not explicitly contrast.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_all_bot_metrics). The description implies it's for a single bot but lacks when-not or alternative recommendations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/AlgoChains/algochains-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server