submit_to_marketplace

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds context about the 7-gate validation and tier classification, but fails to mention potential side effects such as marketplace listing creation or pricing (price_monthly parameter). Given annotations provide idempotentHint=true and openWorldHint=true, more clarity on external impacts is needed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences (22 words), front-loaded with the main action, and contains no superfluous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (17 parameters, no output schema, no param descriptions), the description is too brief. It does not explain parameter meanings, return structure, or 'next steps', leaving significant gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description provides no parameter-level guidance. None of the 17 parameters (including 6 required ones) are explained, leaving the agent unable to correctly populate inputs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Submit' and the resource 'validated strategy to the AlgoChains marketplace'. It lists the 7-gate validation process and the returned tier classification, distinguishing it from siblings like validate_strategy and register_strategy.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the strategy should be validated but does not explicitly guide when to use this tool versus alternatives like validate_strategy or register_strategy. No prerequisites or when-not conditions are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.