Skip to main content
Glama
Alex0AI

RepoImmune MCP Server

by Alex0AI

Related Servers

Alternatives to RepoImmune MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to capture, replay, inspect, diff, share, and manage executable bug artifacts (.bug files) via the BugProof CLI, supporting 10 tools and structured prompts for debugging workflows.
      181 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to read and investigate git history through MCP, including blame, diffs, old file versions, and automated bisect to find when a bug was introduced.
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to ask read-only questions about a repository's history through GitHub APIs, including blame, path history, merge base, PR association, diffs, and file contents, with aggressive caching and no clone required.
      10
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to analyze public GitHub repositories directly through tools for repo health scoring, recent commit summaries, good first issue discovery, and semantic Q&A over docs and issues.
      4
      27 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to safely inspect a local repository's code and metadata while blocking private data from leaving the machine, providing read-only tools for search, change tracking, and integrity verification.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to turn human-verified development failures into reusable bug knowledge and executable acceptance standards, then generate graded verification plans and record structured evidence for human review.
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action and resource, but some functional overlap exists: 'search_past_failures' and 'get_regression_test' both relate to historical failures, and 'explain_code_history' and 'check_patch_against_memory' both deal with stored repository memory. The descriptions are terse but generally enough to guide selection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent lowercase snake_case verb-first pattern: search_, explain_, check_, list_, get_, replay_. The naming style is uniform and predictable across the entire set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a specialized repository memory/invariant server. Each tool has a clear purpose, and the count feels neither thin nor bloated for the apparent domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the main read/replay workflow: searching failures, explaining history, checking patches, listing invariants, and replaying test cases. The only notable gap is the lack of any tool to record or update memory/invariants, but this may be intentional if ingestion happens outside the server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues