Skip to main content
Glama
Alex0AI

RepoImmune MCP Server

by Alex0AI

Related Servers

Alternatives to RepoImmune MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to capture, replay, inspect, diff, share, and manage executable bug artifacts (.bug files) via the BugProof CLI, supporting 10 tools and structured prompts for debugging workflows.
      129 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to analyze public GitHub repositories directly through tools for repo health scoring, recent commit summaries, good first issue discovery, and semantic Q&A over docs and issues.
      4
      26 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to safely inspect a local repository's code and metadata while blocking private data from leaving the machine, providing read-only tools for search, change tracking, and integrity verification.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to inspect local and remote repositories through sandboxed tools that surface project overviews, structure, dependency audits, Git churn hotspots, and a heuristic health score. It also supports safe GitHub issue searching and creation with built-in duplicate preflight checks, while blocking sensitive files, binary content, and path traversal attacks.
      19 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI coding agents with Git repository history analysis, including churn hotspot detection, semantic file coupling, and recent context summaries through MCP tools.
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action and resource, but some functional overlap exists: 'search_past_failures' and 'get_regression_test' both relate to historical failures, and 'explain_code_history' and 'check_patch_against_memory' both deal with stored repository memory. The descriptions are terse but generally enough to guide selection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent lowercase snake_case verb-first pattern: search_, explain_, check_, list_, get_, replay_. The naming style is uniform and predictable across the entire set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a specialized repository memory/invariant server. Each tool has a clear purpose, and the count feels neither thin nor bloated for the apparent domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the main read/replay workflow: searching failures, explaining history, checking patches, listing invariants, and replaying test cases. The only notable gap is the lack of any tool to record or update memory/invariants, but this may be intentional if ingestion happens outside the server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues