buscar_pruebas

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Busca' and 'Filtra' make the core search/filter behavior clear, but the description does not disclose details such as result format, limits, or behavior when no filters are supplied.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no wasted words. It front-loads the primary purpose and then lists the optional filter dimensions, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple optional-filter search tool with no nested objects and no output schema, the description is mostly sufficient: it names the domain, the action, and the filters. The only minor gap is that it does not explicitly mention returning a list of matching events or any pagination/result behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already describes all three parameters with 100% coverage, so the baseline is 3. The description adds only that the filters are optional, which is already conveyed by the absence of required fields, and provides no extra format or syntax detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb (Busca) and resource (pruebas deportivas en SportLink), and the optional filters clarify scope. This cleanly separates it from sibling tools like buscar_entrenamientos, buscar_empleos, and buscar_clubes, which target different resource types.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives a clear context (search sport events) and indicates that filters are optional, but it does not explicitly say when to prefer this tool over alternatives or mention any exclusions. Correct usage is mostly implied by the resource name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.