buscar_entrenamientos

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It implies a read-only search operation and mentions optional filtering, but it does not disclose details like result format, pagination, or authentication requirements. It is adequate but not deeply transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that states the core purpose first and the optional filters second. There is no redundant or filler content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple search tool with three optional string parameters and no nested objects, the description is mostly complete. It covers what the tool does and the filtering options, though it omits any mention of the return shape or result limits, which is a minor gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with each parameter already documented. The description only echoes the parameter names (deporte, ubicacion, nivel) without adding new semantic detail, so it stays at the baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Busca entrenamientos deportivos') and the platform ('SportLink'), with optional filters for deporte, ubicacion, and nivel. It also distinguishes itself from siblings like buscar_entrenadores by targeting 'entrenamientos' rather than people.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives a clear context: use this to search sports trainings, with optional filters. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternative tools such as buscar_entrenadores or buscar_clubes, so some inference is required.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.