Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
accessibility-mcp-server

accessibility-mcp-server

by AiAgentKarl
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to accessibility-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Accessibility MCP Server

      jbuchan
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform comprehensive accessibility audits on websites using Playwright and axe-core against WCAG standards. Provides detailed compliance reports with violation summaries and remediation guidance across multiple browsers.
      3
      MIT

    • mcp-a11y-tools

      rog0x
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with web accessibility analysis tools via MCP, enabling checks for alt text, heading hierarchy, color contrast, ARIA validation, and form accessibility.
      46 npm
      MIT

    • a11y-toolkit

      kinti
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform WCAG 2.2 accessibility audits, including contrast ratio checks for color pairs and text-over-image, generate EU legal accessibility declarations, and produce aria-live monitoring snippets, all through local, multilingual tools.
      37
      495 PyPI
      6
      MIT

    • QA Testing MCP Server

      jpa012401
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform comprehensive web application testing including visual, functional, performance, accessibility, and SEO analysis using browser automation without requiring API keys.
      7
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of accessibility testing (color contrast, form labels, headings, images, etc.), but check_url_accessibility overlaps with several individual checks (images, headings, forms). Despite this, descriptions clearly distinguish between comprehensive and focused checks, so confusion is limited.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools use the verb_noun pattern with 'check_', but there are exceptions: generate_a11y_report, list_wcag_rules, and validate_aria. While names are clear, the mix of verbs and a few underscores with abbreviations (a11y) breaks full consistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the server covers core accessibility checks, a combined scan, rule reference, and ARIA validation. The count is well-scoped for an automated accessibility testing tool, neither too sparse nor too bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The set includes essential WCAG checks like color contrast, headings, images, forms, and ARIA, plus a report generator and rule list. However, it lacks checks for keyboard navigation, focus order, or more advanced dynamic content, which are minor gaps for an automated audit.

    Resources