update_phased_release

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the two main operations but lacks details on behavioral traits such as whether conversion is irreversible, prerequisites (e.g., state must be phased), or error conditions. With no annotations, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, with no unnecessary words. It front-loads the primary action ('Convert phased release to full') and adds the secondary action ('update its schedule/percentage').

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the tool's purpose but lacks completeness: it does not explain parameter interactions, required prerequisites (e.g., app_id context), or what the response contains. Given the complexity (6 parameters) and no output schema, more information is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema coverage, the description adds minimal additional meaning. It mentions 'schedule' and 'percentage' which map to schema parameters but does not provide usage context or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses specific verbs ('Convert', 'update') and identifies the resource ('phased release') and its attributes ('schedule/percentage'). It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'change_phased_release_state' by implying separate functionality. However, it could explicitly mention the 'release_type' and 'state' parameters.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines provided. The description does not specify when to use this tool versus the sibling 'change_phased_release_state' or other tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.