Huawei App Gallery

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. The 'app draft' qualifier adds valuable behavioral context (doesn't affect published versions), but omits destructive warnings, irreversibility notes, or error behavior for non-existent languages.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with action verb, zero wasted words. Every token earns its place by conveying operation type, target resource, and scope constraints.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate but minimal for a destructive operation. The 'app draft' mention provides essential context given sibling submit_app exists, but lacks output hints, safety warnings, or interaction details expected when no annotations or output schema are present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% description coverage (app_id with env fallback documentation, lang with format example). Description mentions 'localized store listing' which semantically links to the lang parameter, but baseline 3 is appropriate when schema carries full documentation load.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Excellent specific verb ('Remove') paired with clear resource ('localized store listing') and scope ('from the app draft'). The 'draft' qualifier crucially distinguishes this from operating on published apps, and the action clearly contrasts with sibling tool update_language_info.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use versus update_language_info, or preconditions for deletion. Lacks 'when-not-to-use' warnings, though the specificity of 'Remove...from draft' provides implicit context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.