Skip to main content
Glama
Aethis-ai

aethis-mcp

Official
by Aethis-ai
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to aethis-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • TARA

      hbapuram
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to trace regulatory rule changes to affected parties and required actions through deterministic safety gates, returning dated action plans and hash-linked evidence records. Supports 12 MCP tools over stdio or streamable HTTP for source comparison, obligation decomposition, scope assessment, planning, and evidence validation across multiple domain packs.
      MIT
    • OMNIA MCP by Omniaeye

      OMNIA MCPofficial

      Omniaeye
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to evaluate context against custom criteria and receive typed decisions (classifications, scores, probabilities) from JEV or local LAYA, with validation policies and durable decision records.
      4
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • decide

      decidefyi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Deterministic MCP notary suite for subscription policies: refund, cancellation, return, and trial terms. Stateless, read-only rules engine with auditable verdicts and hosted remote endpoints.
      14 npm
      1
      MIT

    • jev

      nandansrikrishna
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to evaluate single records or batches with dynamically authored typed questions, returning structured decisions and probabilities.
      MIT
    • Jev MCP Server by keysersoft

      Jev MCP Serverofficial

      keysersoft
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to run read-only yes/no checks, classifications, and ordered scores with probabilities, supporting triage, routing, sentiment, and lead-fit decisions through hosted or self-hosted MCP tools.
      41 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 35 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct actions within the authoring/decision lifecycle, and descriptions often explicitly disambiguate similar-sounding pairs (e.g. discover_rulesets vs list_rulesets, schema vs rulebook_schema). However, with 35 tools there are several easily confused clusters: discover/refine/validate for sections and fields, add_guidance vs add_domain_guidance, and explain vs graph vs explain_failure.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use the same aethis_ snake_case prefix and are mostly verb_noun (e.g. create_ruleset, list_projects, archive_project). Minor deviations include noun-only or verb-only names like aethis_schema, aethis_graph, aethis_decide, and aethis_refine, but the overall convention is predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    35 tools is heavy for the apparent domain, well above the 3–15 sweet spot. Many operations are split into discover/refine/validate triples, suggesting consolidation could reduce surface area without losing capability.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers a full authoring lifecycle: discovery, field/section validation, generation, testing, refinement, publishing, archiving, guidance, usage, and review. Minor gaps remain, such as no rulebook archival/deletion, no direct ruleset update tool, and no get_project or list_tests operation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources