Skip to main content
Glama
OMNIA MCP
by Omniaeye

OMNIA MCP brings JEV and local LAYA into agent workflows through the Model Context Protocol. Give an agent the context, define the questions that matter, and receive decisions it can use: classifications, scored assessments, and probabilities for specific claims.

A single request can assess several dimensions of a document, conversation, software update, or market observation. OMNIA validates the answers, applies your review thresholds, and records the result with its model identity, policy, and evidence references.

Intelligence in context

The intelligence is in evaluating meaning against context and criteria. The answer format makes that assessment usable by software.

For a news item, an agent can assess the event type, its relevance, who made a claim, and whether the supplied source supports it. For a token observation, it can assess whether fields are complete, whether reported conditions match a policy, and which review category applies. Each question addresses a distinct part of the decision.

Assessment

Question you can define

Native result

Event classification

Is this a product launch, a security update, routine maintenance, or something else?

choice: selected category and the probability of each alternative

Relevance and priority

How significant is the update under our editorial rubric?

score: a position across your ordered levels, with its distribution

Evidence support

Does the supplied source support, contradict, or leave a claim unaddressed?

choice: a bounded assessment of the supplied evidence

Attribution

Is the claim made by the main author, a quoted author, or is attribution unclear?

choice: explicit alternatives, including an unknown category

Completeness

Does this observation contain the fields required by our policy?

noul: a probability for the defined true/yes condition

Workflow routing

Which review queue or next step best fits this context?

choice: an application-defined route

These are questions you configure through the same evaluation interface. Your application supplies the records and defines the available answers. Exact arithmetic, transaction limits, and mandatory requirements belong in deterministic application checks.

Several assessments can inform one action. An application can combine relevance, source support, and attribution before routing an item to an editor. It can combine field completeness, reported risk, and freshness checks before requesting a deeper market review. OMNIA returns the assessments; the application owns their combination and the action that follows.

Related MCP server: jev

JEV/LAYA, natively

OMNIA uses the providers' native decision types. It preserves selected labels, ordinal score semantics, probabilities, and available confidence fields in a common MCP response.

JEV

LAYA

Inference

TypeSafe's hosted evaluation API

Local inference through the public laya==0.3.20 runtime

Model identity

Explicit version; default jev-1.13.0

Explicit checkpoint family and full revision SHA

Input

Supplied text, JSON objects, or JSON arrays

The same request contract, within the selected checkpoint's input budget

Answers

choice, score, noul

choice, score, noul

Operation

API credential, bounded HTTP requests, retry controls

Optional runtime, isolated worker, configured device and threads

Data path

Context and questions go to TypeSafe

Inference stays local; offline operation uses prepared dependencies and weights

Choice compares the alternatives you define. Score evaluates an ordered rubric and can return a value between levels. Noul expresses the probability of a specified condition, retaining uncertainty instead of reducing the result to a bare boolean.

Questions in one request share the supplied state and are evaluated independently. For a dependent sequence, the calling agent can pass an earlier result into the next request. Provider selection is explicit; OMNIA does not silently move local context to a hosted service.

The decision path

flowchart LR
    Agent[MCP client or agent] --> Context[Context and questions]
    Context --> Model{JEV / LAYA}
    Model --> Answers[Native typed answers]
    Answers --> Policy[Validation and review policy]
    Policy --> Record[Decision record]
    Record --> Agent

The record includes a decision ID, input fingerprint, provider/model identity, answers, applied policy, review reasons, evidence references, timing, and available usage metadata. Repeated identical requests can reuse the configured cache. Earlier decisions can be retrieved by ID.

accepted means the response passed the configured checks. needs_review preserves answers that fall below a probability or margin threshold. Neither status grants permission to publish, trade, or execute an external action.

Evaluate several dimensions

This example asks three independent questions about one software update. It keeps the maintainer's statement separate from the quoted comment.

Call omnia_capabilities first, then send these arguments to omnia_evaluate:

{
  "request": {
    "state": {
      "source": "GitHub",
      "project": "Atlas SDK",
      "main_author": "maintainer",
      "main_update": "Version 2.4 is available. It adds streaming responses and fixes connection recovery.",
      "quoted_comment": {
        "author": "community_member",
        "text": "This will double every customer's revenue."
      }
    },
    "questions": {
      "event_type": {
        "type": "choice",
        "instructions": "Classify main_update. Keep quoted_comment separate from the maintainer's statement.",
        "criteria": {
          "release": "An available software version with described changes",
          "maintenance": "Routine repository upkeep without a release announcement",
          "other": "Neither category is supported by the main update"
        }
      },
      "relevance": {
        "type": "score",
        "instructions": "Rate the user-facing significance described in main_update, excluding quoted_comment.",
        "criteria": [
          "Routine bookkeeping with no described user-facing change",
          "A minor improvement to existing behavior",
          "A new capability or a described reliability fix"
        ]
      },
      "author_claim": {
        "type": "noul",
        "instructions": "Does main_update itself claim that customer revenue will double? Do not attribute quoted_comment to the maintainer."
      }
    },
    "policy": {
      "min_probability": 0.8,
      "min_margin": 0.1
    }
  }
}

The response contains a separate answer for each question, plus the decision record and review status. The request above is an illustrative input; recorded provider results are in the validation report.

Quickstart

Requires Python 3.11–3.14. Install the released source with uv:

uv tool install "git+https://github.com/Omniaeye/omnia-mcp.git@v0.1.0"
omnia-mcp version
omnia-mcp doctor

To use JEV, set these variables in the environment that launches your MCP server:

OMNIA_DEFAULT_PROVIDER=jev
OMNIA_ALLOWED_PROVIDERS=jev
TYPESAFE_API_KEY=<your TypeSafe API key>

Register the installed executable in your client:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "omnia": {
      "command": "omnia-mcp",
      "args": ["serve"]
    }
  }
}

Use an absolute executable path when the client cannot find omnia-mcp. The server reads its process environment; it does not automatically load .env files. .env.example lists every setting.

Client

Configuration example

Claude Code

.mcp.json

Claude Desktop

claude_desktop_config.json

Cursor

mcp.json

VS Code

mcp.json

These recipes follow each client's documented configuration format. See compatibility for client checks and supported transport.

Run LAYA locally

Install from a checkout when configuring the local runtime:

git clone https://github.com/Omniaeye/omnia-mcp.git
cd omnia-mcp
git checkout v0.1.0
python -m venv .venv

Platform

Install the local runtime

macOS / Linux

.venv/bin/python -m pip install ".[local-laya]"

Windows PowerShell

.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe -m pip install ".[local-laya]"

Configure the provider and checkpoint:

OMNIA_DEFAULT_PROVIDER=laya
OMNIA_ALLOWED_PROVIDERS=laya
OMNIA_LAYA_MODEL=english
OMNIA_LAYA_REVISION=55cf4c4ebb4ebe31b2550e8bdf3bd21b99753851
OMNIA_LAYA_DEVICE=cpu
OMNIA_LAYA_THREADS=2

Point your MCP client at .venv/bin/omnia-mcp or .venv\Scripts\omnia-mcp.exe. This configuration selects the checkpoint used in the recorded local smoke tests. typed-decisions and multilingual are also supported checkpoint-family selections; choose and validate the corresponding revision and input limits for your task.

For offline operation, prepare the exact snapshot and dependencies before setting OMNIA_LAYA_OFFLINE=true. To enable both providers, use OMNIA_ALLOWED_PROVIDERS=jev,laya, configure each, and select one through request.provider or OMNIA_DEFAULT_PROVIDER. See configuration.

MCP interface

Tool

Arguments

Purpose

omnia_evaluate

request

Evaluate the questions against one supplied state.

omnia_evaluate_batch

request.items

Evaluate a bounded collection of requests with per-item results or errors.

omnia_capabilities

None

Inspect enabled providers, question types, and operating limits.

omnia_get_decision

decision_id

Retrieve a persisted decision without another inference call.

Resources: omnia://guide for usage and omnia://schemas for complete contracts. The same schemas are available locally:

omnia-mcp schemas

doctor checks configuration and package presence without loading a model or making a provider call. serve starts the stdio server; running omnia-mcp with no subcommand does the same.

Operating controls

Configure input size, question count, batch size, concurrency, queue capacity, deadlines, retries, and per-minute/per-day evaluation allowances. Responses are validated against the submitted questions, including rubric identity and rounded probability consistency. Failed requests return explicit errors.

The SQLite ledger retains answers, labels, rubric descriptions, evidence references, fingerprints, and model metadata. It does not retain the full input state by default. Cache lifetime and automatic retention are configurable; records can still contain sensitive application data.

Evidence references are carried with a decision, not fetched. Supply the actual source text when a question needs it. Applications own collection, exact rule enforcement, publication, and execution. OMNIA MCP provides typed assessments rather than free-form text generation or autonomous trading.

Validation

The release has recorded real JEV and local LAYA inference checks, stdio integration tests, Docker checks, and Windows/Linux CI across Python 3.11–3.13.

The multilingual JEV acceptance suite covers software updates, quoted authorship, missing fields, and explicit snapshot rules in English, Portuguese, Chinese, and Japanese. Its initial 100 evaluations exposed a rounding-validation defect. After the correction, a fresh run passed 20/20 cases and 48/48 answer checks. The complete controlled suite passed 175 tests.

Read the results and original evidence. These results describe the recorded cases; choose thresholds against reviewed examples from your own workload.

OMNIA software

Project

Focus

OMNIA MCP

The agent-facing interface to hosted JEV and local LAYA.

OMNIA LAYA

OMNIA's independent Laya integration fork for local decision workflows.

OMNIA News

Source-content assessment and configurable feed decisions.

OMNIA Trading

Market, holder, liquidity, and risk observation assessments.

These are separate repositories. This MCP package connects directly to TypeSafe and the public LAYA runtime; it does not automatically install or run the News and Trading pipelines.

Documentation and development

Architecture · Configuration · Compatibility · Releasing · Security · Contributing

python -m pip install --upgrade pip
python -m pip install -e . --group dev
python -m ruff check .
python -m ruff format --check .
python -m pytest
python -m build
python -m twine check dist/*

The default suite requires no provider credentials. Live inference remains explicit opt-in.

Provider references: JEV state and context · Composing assessments · Evidence assessment · LAYA upstream.

License and attribution

Apache License 2.0. Original OMNIA MCP code is maintained by OMNIA EYE Corporation. JEV is provided through TypeSafe; LAYA is developed by Convai Innovations. Upstream authorship, licenses, service terms, and model terms remain with their respective projects. See NOTICE.

Available Tools

4 tools
omnia_capabilitiesA
Read-only

Report configured capabilities; this does not load or probe models.

Inputs: no named parameters. Returns: object

omnia_evaluateB
Destructive

Evaluate a request, persist its audit record, and expire records under retention.

Inputs: request (required). Returns: model, usage, cached, policy, +11 more

omnia_evaluate_batchB
Destructive

Evaluate a batch, persist audit records, and expire records under retention.

Inputs: request (required). Returns: items, schema_version

omnia_get_decisionA
Read-only

Read a persisted local decision by its opaque ID, without re-evaluating it.

Inputs: decision_id (required). Returns: model, usage, cached, policy, +11 more

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Loading tool schema changelog…

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools are mostly distinct: evaluate handles single requests, evaluate_batch handles groups, get_decision reads persisted results, and capabilities reports configuration. There is minor potential confusion between evaluate and evaluate_batch, but the descriptions clarify the difference.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow an omnia_<verb>_<object> pattern, but omnia_capabilities is a bare noun and omnia_evaluate lacks an object, breaking the otherwise consistent style. All names share the omnia_ prefix and snake_case, so the inconsistency is moderate rather than chaotic.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is a well-scoped size for this server's purpose. Each tool covers a distinct operation—single evaluation, batch evaluation, reading decisions, and capability reporting—without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core evaluation lifecycle: evaluate single, evaluate batch, and read persisted decisions, plus capability discovery. A listing or search over persisted decisions would round it out, but the existing tools support the primary workflow without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Related MCP Connectors

    Related MCP Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides coding agents and CI with a typed decision layer that sends bounded state and questions to Jev, then returns deterministic actions for review, risk assessment, requirement checks, and verification.
      9
      242 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to evaluate single records or batches with dynamically authored typed questions, returning structured decisions and probabilities.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables typed decisions (yes/no, choice, score) with transparent preflight checks, honest confidence reporting, and health monitoring.
      78 npm
      Apache 2.0