acedatacloud_get_services_proxies

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full disclosure burden. It signals that auth/ownership checks gate the call, which is genuinely useful, but says nothing about pagination behavior (despite limit/offset params), result shape, or what a "proxy" record contains.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences with the resource statement front-loaded and zero padding, but the brevity reflects under-specification rather than density — the space saved is information the agent needed.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need not be described, but the vague purpose, undocumented parameters, absent annotations, and missing sibling differentiation leave the definition inadequate for a paged list-style endpoint.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description mentions none of the four parameters. The required `id` is undocumented (service id? proxy id?), and limit/offset/ordering are entirely unexplained in both schema and description, so the caller must guess.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"Get services proxies" essentially restates the tool name with a verb+resource pairing but adds no scope, no notion of what a "proxy" is here, and no differentiation from the close sibling acedatacloud_get_services_apis. An agent cannot tell what this retrieves beyond the bare resource name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states permission prerequisites ("Backend account permissions and ownership checks apply. Required permissions: public") but gives no when-to-use guidance, no distinction from acedatacloud_get_services_apis or acedatacloud_get_service, and no exclusions. Prerequisites are not usage guidelines.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.