acedatacloud_get_blog_post

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It adds two useful behavioral facts: that only 'published' content is returned (not drafts), and that source fields are 'localized'. It does not cover auth requirements, error behavior, or fallback when a translation is unavailable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single tight sentence with no filler, and the core action is front-loaded. It is perhaps slightly too terse to route the agent between sibling read tools, but nothing wastes space.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be described, and all parameters are documented in the schema. For a simple read-by-slug tool the description is nearly complete, missing only guidance on missing/unpublished slugs and localization fallback.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with 'lang' documented as requested translation language and 'slug' as the public blog slug. The phrase 'localized source fields' loosely signals the lang parameter's effect, but adds no format, default, or fallback detail beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Read') and resource ('published article or video'), which maps clearly to a single blog post fetch. It implicitly contrasts with the list sibling (list_blog_posts) by describing a single item, but never names the sibling explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The 'published' framing implies this is for retrieving an individual live post by slug, which naturally distinguishes it from list_blog_posts. However, there is no explicit when-to-use statement, no exclusions, and no mention of what happens for unpublished or missing slugs.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.